Practice for developing a thermal transformation process step - P105
Practice for developing a thermal transformation process step | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice document | |||||||
Document Type | Practice | ||||||
Document Identifier | 105 | ||||||
Themes | |||||||
Tags | |||||||
Objective functions |
| ||||||
MSTE workflow | Development | ||||||
Prerequisites |
Overview[edit | edit source]
This page provides guidance on taking the thermal transformation step from conceptualization to production. This includes conceptual screening and preliminary selection of tooling and equipment and then detailed finalization of the manufacturing (MSTE) system as a whole. The page is broken into three tabs which cover these activities. Conceptual screening covers initialization of tooling and equipment. For the equipment, this means to decide on its type and consequently on the heat transfer mechanisms involved. This decision should be based on thermal management considerations but should also take into account requirements from the other processing themes. Links to the Systems Catalogue provide a specific list of equipment and tooling to choose from. Preliminary selection involves maturing the material, shape, tooling and equipment and quantifying their parameters. This is done with consideration to foundational and systems level knowledge. Finally, detailed finalization covers the qualification process of ensuring that each component of the system functions as intended and part/material requirements are satisfied (i.e. outcomes are acceptable). Links to Systems Knowledge method documents are located here as well as in specify.
Introduction[edit | edit source]
The thermal transformation step allows to change the chemico-physical state of the resin by monitoring or controlling its temperature. During manufacturing, under the effect of temperature, the resin evolves from a liquid viscous state, allowing forming and consolidation, to a final solid state before demoulding. The thermal transformation cell allows to control the resin’s liquid-to-solid transition and is concerned with meeting the specifications on the material system's thermal history.
In a typical manufacturing workflow, the thermal transformation step precedes the demoulding cell but depending on the process might also follow it when done in several steps. For instance, a room-temperature light-RTM production line might include a cure cell to control the degree of cure before demolding and a post-cure cell to control the final degree of cure. Depending on the manufacturing process, the thermal transformation step can also be integrated with the deposition, impregnation or compaction steps. For instance, in a room-temperature light-RTM process, the thermal transformation step happens concurrently with the impregnation and consolidation steps.
This Practice KPD provides the current practice to select, specify, and qualify a thermal transformation step for a given part and therefore combination of material and shape.
Significance[edit | edit source]
The thermal transformation step is one of the most critical manufacturing steps, on which depends most of the manufacturing outcomes. It allows to change the physical state of the resin by monitoring or controlling the resin’s temperature. During manufacturing, the resin evolves from a liquid viscous state, allowing forming and consolidation, to a final solid state before demoulding. Thermoplastic resins are subject to the reverse transition first to reach the liquid viscous state. Thermoset resins undergo an additional transition, a rubbery-to-solid transition, before the final glassy solid transition.
The liquid-to-solid transition is the consequence of a thermally induced change of molecular structure, cross-linking for thermoset resins and crystallization for thermoplastic resins, which dictates the resin’s process–structure–performance relationships. For instance, the operating temperature of a thermoset part depends on the resin's glass transition temperature which in turn is a function of its degree of cure (i.e. cross-linking density). The liquid-to-solid transition not only impact the thermal management (TM) outcomes (i.e. degree of cure, cure rate, etc.) but also the manufacturing outcomes related to material deposition management (MDM), flow and compaction management (FCM), and residual stress and dimensional control management (RSDM). For instance, the kinetics of the liquid-to-solid transition dictates, depending on the equipment and material system, the amount of resin flow and therefore MDM, FCM and RSDM outcomes such as fibre volume fraction, porosity content, and residual stresses. In order to control the liquid-to-solid transition, it is therefore key for the material system to follow a specified thermal history as defined by TM, MDM, FCM and RSDM requirements. The definition of the thermal specifications is part of the development process of the material system.
Prerequisites[edit | edit source]
Practice[edit | edit source]
Explore this area further
Related pages
About | Help |
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.