The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Practice for developing a thermal transformation process step - P105

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Practice - A6Integrated Product Development - A249Practice for Developing a Process Step - P104Practice for developing a thermal transformation process step - P105
 
Practice for developing a thermal transformation process step
Practice document
Develop-T8YDvsLV3DUJ.svg
Document Type Practice
Document Identifier 105
Themes
Tags
Objective functions
CostMaintain
RateMaintain
QualityMaintain
MSTE workflow Development
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

This page provides guidance on taking the thermal transformation step from conceptualization to production. This includes conceptual screening and preliminary selection of tooling and equipment and then detailed finalization of the manufacturing (MSTE) system as a whole. The page is broken into three tabs which cover these activities. Conceptual screening covers initialization of tooling and equipment. For the equipment, this means to decide on its type and consequently on the heat transfer mechanisms involved. This decision should be based on thermal management considerations but should also take into account requirements from the other processing themes. Links to the Systems Catalogue provide a specific list of equipment and tooling to choose from. Preliminary selection involves maturing the material, shape, tooling and equipment and quantifying their parameters. This is done with consideration to foundational and systems level knowledge. Finally, detailed finalization covers the qualification process of ensuring that each component of the system functions as intended and part/material requirements are satisfied (i.e. outcomes are acceptable). Links to Systems Knowledge method documents are located here as well as in specify.

Introduction[edit | edit source]

The thermal transformation step allows to change the chemico-physical state of the resin by monitoring or controlling its temperature. During manufacturing, under the effect of temperature, the resin evolves from a liquid viscous state, allowing forming and consolidation, to a final solid state before demoulding. The thermal transformation cell allows to control the resin’s liquid-to-solid transition and is concerned with meeting the specifications on the material system's thermal history.

In a typical manufacturing workflow, the thermal transformation step precedes the demoulding cell but depending on the process might also follow it when done in several steps. For instance, a room-temperature light-RTM production line might include a cure cell to control the degree of cure before demolding and a post-cure cell to control the final degree of cure. Depending on the manufacturing process, the thermal transformation step can also be integrated with the deposition, impregnation or compaction steps. For instance, in a room-temperature light-RTM process, the thermal transformation step happens concurrently with the impregnation and consolidation steps.

This Practice KPD provides the current practice to select, specify, and qualify a thermal transformation step for a given part and therefore combination of material and shape.

Significance[edit | edit source]

The thermal transformation step is one of the most critical manufacturing steps, on which depends most of the manufacturing outcomes. It allows to change the physical state of the resin by monitoring or controlling the resin’s temperature. During manufacturing, the resin evolves from a liquid viscous state, allowing forming and consolidation, to a final solid state before demoulding. Thermoplastic resins are subject to the reverse transition first to reach the liquid viscous state. Thermoset resins undergo an additional transition, a rubbery-to-solid transition, before the final glassy solid transition.

The liquid-to-solid transition is the consequence of a thermally induced change of molecular structure, cross-linking for thermoset resins and crystallization for thermoplastic resins, which dictates the resin’s process–structure–performance relationships. For instance, the operating temperature of a thermoset part depends on the resin's glass transition temperature which in turn is a function of its degree of cure (i.e. cross-linking density). The liquid-to-solid transition not only impact the thermal management (TM) outcomes (i.e. degree of cure, cure rate, etc.) but also the manufacturing outcomes related to material deposition management (MDM), flow and compaction management (FCM), and residual stress and dimensional control management (RSDM). For instance, the kinetics of the liquid-to-solid transition dictates, depending on the equipment and material system, the amount of resin flow and therefore MDM, FCM and RSDM outcomes such as fibre volume fraction, porosity content, and residual stresses. In order to control the liquid-to-solid transition, it is therefore key for the material system to follow a specified thermal history as defined by TM, MDM, FCM and RSDM requirements. The definition of the thermal specifications is part of the development process of the material system.

Prerequisites[edit | edit source]

Practice[edit | edit source]

  • Prior to beginning this stage, you should have already initialized your part's material and shape (see Practice for initializing part and materials page). For example, you might have screened a low temperature cure polyester resin and decided on a curved single skin design. The initialization of material and shape allows the initialization of the thermal transformation step and the conceptual screening of the type of tooling and equipment (i.e. autoclave, oven, hot press, heated tool, room-temperature process, etc.). Some questions to be answered at this stage include:
    • What sized part(s) do you want to make?
    • What types of materials do you want to process?
    • What range of capital costs do you want to invest?
    • What type of production rate do you want to achieve?
    • What type of production quality do you want to achieve?
  • The information from the answers to the above questions will allow you to narrow down the thermal transformation step and screen the type of tooling and equipment.
  • Refer to the Thermal transformation factory process step page for which equipment, tooling and consumables are relevant to your thermal transformation process step.
  • When screening, the type of tooling and equipment and to address the quality requirements, you must consider whether or not the resulting manufacturing (MSTE) system will be able to meet the material's thermal specifications and so must take into account the:
  • Ensure that the type of tooling and equipment screened can ultimately satisfy the defined cost, rate and quality (i.e. thermal specifications) outcomes.
  • Select the screened tooling(s) and equipment by providing information on their parameters (see System parameters page of the Systems Knowledge volume), such as for the equipment:
    • Working volume
    • Critical dimensions (aspect ratio)
    • Working pressure and maximum temperature
    • Desired heating and cooling rate performances
    • Instrumentation requirements (thermocouples, pressure sensors, etc.)
    • Other factory requirements (vacuum lines, etc.)
  • Perform thermal analysis of the screened manufacturing (MSTE) system(s) to specify and identify which one(s) allow to satisfy the material's thermal specifications. These analyses should focus on accurately determining the thermal management outcomes of the manufacturing system as a whole. Guides to carrying out these analyses can be found in the Systems knowledge method documents. In particular, the How to perform a numerical thermal profile method document is of most use here since the material, tooling and equipment may not be physically available at this stage. Alternatively, the thermal analysis can be done experimentally using a representative manufacturing system as explained in the How to perform an experimental thermal profile method document. A key outcome of this step is to turn the material's thermal history into an equipment temperature cycle. The next step described below ensures that the equipment can deliver the identified temperature cycle.
  • Perform thermal analysis of the selected manufacturing (MSTE) system to convert the equipment heating and cooling rate performance specifications (i.e., maximum temperature, heating and cooling rates) into design requirements. The objective of this analysis is to right-size the heating and cooling systems, and in the case of a convection-based equipment, its airflow system. The way that the equipment responds to a thermal load, i.e. material, shape and tooling, is highly dependent on the thermal mass and thermal properties of the load and the heat transfer between the equipment and the load. Guides to carrying out this analysis can be found in the Systems knowledge method documents.
  • Current practice hands over the responsibility of converting the performance specifications into design requirements to the equipment manufacturer. You might decide to rely on the equipment manufacturer expertise. In that case, you will have to define a representative thermal load for the equipment manufacturer. Be aware that current practice usually:
    • Consider the thermal mass of the representative load to size the heating and cooling systems.
    • Does not consider the real part's geometry and dimensions. This is of significance for convection-based equipment for which the heat transfer coefficient not only depends on the airflow system but also the part's shape.
    • Is done for an inert thermal load and does not take into account the material endo and/or exothermic behavior.


  • Whereas the preliminary selection is generally done by analysis because the material, tooling and equipment have not been purchased yet, the detailed finalization and qualification is usually done experimentally. The procedure used to ensure that the thermal history of a composite part is compliant with the thermal specifications (i.e. ramp rate, maximum exotherm peaks, temperature uniformity, etc.) is called thermal profiling.
  • Refer to the How to perform an experimental thermal profile method document for a step-by-step thermal profiling procedure.
  • Note that the thermal profiling results can be used to improve the analyses done during the specification step and increase the understanding of how the system is performing.

Explore this area further

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles


About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.