The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Practice for Developing a Process Step - P104

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Practice - A6Integrated Product Development - A249Practice for Developing a Process Step - P104
 
Practice for Developing a Process Step
Practice document
Develop-T8YDvsLV3DUJ.svg
Document Type Practice
Document Identifier 104
MSTE workflow Development
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

The practice documents listed below are specific to individual process steps. They provide guidance on how to develop the equipment and tooling composing the manufacturing (MSTE) system of a process step beginning at anywhere from the conceptual state, up to the production state. They take into consideration the maturity of the material and shape defining the part and also provide guidelines on their concurrent development.

it is important to keep in mind that the decisions made in one process step will have implications on previous and future steps that are developed. Therefore, the steps do not have to be developed in any particular order and you may choose to develop a step that is the most defined first.

Process Step Design Gates[edit | edit source]

The development process for each process step consists in maturing the manufacturing (MSTE) system through three process design gates[1]:

  1. Conceptual screening
  2. Preliminary selection
  3. Detailed finalization


The conceptual screening covers the initialization, i.e. type selection, of material, shape, tooling, and equipment. The Systems Catalogue is useful for this step as it provides a comprehensive list of material, tooling, and equipment to consider. At this stage there is the highest level of design freedom with many options to consider, but it is also a step where significant costs are committed through the decision made at this stage. When coming into this step for developers starting from scratch, the material and shape should be partially defined so that these previous decisions can be used to inform the screening process for tooling and equipment.

The preliminary selection involves defining the parameters of the manufacturing (MSTE) system in such way to meet the expected process step's outcomes. This is done with consideration to foundational and systems level knowledge. This involves quantifying parameters of the MSTE, ensuring that the screened equipment and tooling can operate well enough for the application. This is also the stage where equipment may be purchased or prototype equipment is made.

Finally, the detailed finalization covers the qualification process of ensuring that each component of the manufacturing (MSTE) system functions as intended and that the specified process step's outcomes are satisfied. At this stage, the material, shape, tooling, and equipment exists and is being tested and optimized for production. Alterations of the MSTE components at this stage of the development process will add significant costs.

Process Step Development Pages[edit | edit source]

The practice documents are outlined according to these three design gates. The page will provide questions to consider along with some examples and useful links. The pages will then provide guidance on how to secure approval and begin commissioning the step that was developed. This is done through the lens of both quality assurance and specific certifications required for different industries and products. The articles will outline common verification methods and tests as well as certification bodies.

Lastly, the practice documents will lead to further articles on best practice for how to perform various aspects of the process step and how to avoid common issues that can arise. For example: Ensuring quality during production of variable thickness parts.

Practice Document[edit | edit source]

Listed below are the practice documents available for developing a process step:


References

  1. [Ref] Fabris, Janna Noemi (2018). A Framework for Formalizing Science Based Composites Manufacturing Practice (Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. doi:10.14288/1.0372787.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.