Interview with Prof. Kevin Potter - A134
Interview with Prof. Kevin Potter | |
---|---|
Perspectives article | |
Document Type | Article |
Document Identifier | 134 |
Themes | |
Tags |
Introduction[edit | edit source]
Emeritus Professor Kevin Potter has an unusual biography for today’s academic world in that he has extensive experience in both industry and academia. Graduating from Imperial College of Science and Technology with a BSc in Materials Science in 1974, he then went on to work in Industry for a number of years before pursuing a career as an academic so that he could reach a wider audience.
His time in industry was spent gaining practical experience with the UK Ministry of Defence’s Propellants Explosives and Rocket Motor Establishment (PERME), BP Research (including collaboration with Moore Plastics), BP Advanced Materials and BP Norway. He then moved on to consulting and writing textbooks before joining the University of Bristol in 1995; first as a contract researcher, then as a Faculty member, and finally as Chair in Composites Manufacturing. There Professor Potter led research on the forming of prepreg materials (including woven, continuous UD and short fibre aligned materials), resin transfer moulding, manufacturing defects and variability, and recycling of composite materials. He also contributed to the founding of the UK’s National Composites Centre.
In this interview, Professor Potter gives us an overview of his career along with the challenges faced and the lessons learned throughout. His thoughts on four of the main areas where effort should be focused in the near term provide useful insight into what companies and researchers should be focusing on to improve their products, business and the industry as whole. These four main areas are:
- Improving factory productivity
- Costing & new product introduction
- How to grow the composites industry
- Improving structural optimization
His mixture of industrial and academic experience through a large portion of the modern day development of composites makes his perspectives particularly insightful. In addition to the interview below, we refer you to his book chapter 'But How Can We Make Something Useful Out of Black String?' The Development of Carbon Fibre Composites Manufacturing (1965-2015)[1] (see the reference page for a link to a freely available (open access) copy.
Interview[edit | edit source]
Additional information for select chapters[edit | edit source]
Chapter |
Chapter Title | Links to related information in the Knowledge in Practice Centre |
---|---|---|
1 |
Kevin Potter's personal history | N/A |
2 |
Lack of flow-control in early carbon fibre prepreg | |
3 |
Making complex geometries through forming | Future content |
4 |
Early focus on recycling carbon fibre | Future content |
5 |
Early process modelling of forming | Future content |
6 |
Kevlar® (Aramid) fibres and degradation | Future content |
7 |
BP Research (Moore Plastics) development projects | N/A |
8 |
Spring-in and carbon-carbon composites | |
9 |
Mechanical fastening of brittle composites | N/A |
10 |
RTM for aerospace applications | |
11 |
Switching from R&D to production environments | Future content |
12 |
Importance of having defect taxonomies & databases | |
13 |
Failure investigations & the importance of design | Future content |
14 |
Coupling of geometry complexity, stress & defects | Future content |
15 |
From industry to academia | N/A |
16 |
Utility & limitations of mechanical test results | Future content |
17 |
Tailored stiffness of helicopter main rotor hubs | Future content |
18 |
Morphing & multi-stable structures |
|
19 |
Improving rate & quality of composites manufacture | |
20 |
Highly aligned, short fibre composites | Future content |
21 |
UK's National Composites Centre (NCC) | N/A |
22 |
Challenges: Improving factory productivity | Future content |
23 |
Challenges: Costing & new product introduction | Future content |
24 |
Challenges: How to grow the composites industry? | Future content |
25 |
Challenges: Improving structural optimization | Future content |
26 |
Technology that has been overhyped | N/A |
27 |
Why does academia not focus on the factory? | N/A |
28 |
What practice advances have been led by academia? | N/A |
29 |
Advice for new people in the composites field | N/A |
Related pages
References
- ↑ [Ref] Potter, Kevin (2017). "2". In Soutis, Constantinos (ed.). ‘But How Can We Make Something Useful Out of Black String?’ The Development of Carbon Fibre Composites Manufacturing (1965–2015). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46120-5 2 Check
|doi=
value (help). ISBN 978-3-319-46120-5.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ↑ [Ref] Potter, Kevin (2009). Understanding the Origins of Defects and Variability in Composites Manufacture (PDF). International Conference on Composites Materials.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
About | Help |
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.