System parameters - inputs and outcomes - A108
System parameters - inputs and outcomes | |
---|---|
Systems knowledge article | |
General system description breakdown | |
Document Type | Article |
Document Identifier | 108 |
Themes | |
Tags | |
Prerequisites |
Overview[edit | edit source]
In many applications, the outcomes of a given process are due to a number of interacting parameters. Considering the effect of all interacting parameters together is known as a systems level approach. Such an approach can be applied to composites manufacturing[1]. In composite manufacturing processes, the interacting parameters may be attributed to the part material (M), part shape (S), tooling and consumables (T), or the equipment (E). For example, during thermal transformation, the equipment supplies temperature, pressure, and vacuum, which interacts with the material and geometrical properties of the part and tooling to affect the part quality. This includes outcomes such as final degree of cure (DOC), porosity, wrinkling, warpage, spring-in, etc. In other words, part quality is influenced by the MSTE inputs for each process step. This is a useful distinction, as it allows engineers and practitioners to simulate and tailor the appropriate parameters to pass specifications and achieve acceptable part quality.
Any parameter of a system can be constrained physically, by specifications, or by self-imposed desires of the manufacturer/designer[2]. An example of a physical constraint would be the maximum temperature an unloaded oven can reach. This is dictated by the physical design of the oven and cannot be changed. A specification, on the other hand, can be physically changed but is in place to meet regulations. For example, a company in the supply chain for a large OEM may have process specifications imposed on them by the OEM. An example may include the cure window that the material must adhere to. Finally, a designer or manufacturer may impose their own constraints on their manufacturing processes in order to achieve their cost, rate, and quality metrics.
To understand how system parameters come together to influence the system response in a general sense refer to system interactions. For a detailed description of thermal management related system effects refer to the following pages:
- Effect of material in a thermal management system
- Effect of shape in a thermal management system
- Effect of tooling in a thermal management system
- Effect of equipment in a thermal management system
Related pages
Page type | Links |
---|---|
Introduction to Composites Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents | |
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Knowledge Articles | |
Systems Knowledge Method Documents | |
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Catalogue Articles | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment | |
Practice Documents | |
Case Studies | |
Perspectives Articles |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 [Ref] Fabris, Janna Noemi (2018). A Framework for Formalizing Science Based Composites Manufacturing Practice (Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. doi:10.14288/1.0372787.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
- ↑ [Ref] Ashby, M.F. (2011). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-25539-5. ISBN 9781856176637.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
About | Help |
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.