The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

System parameters - inputs and outcomes - A108

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Systems Knowledge - A4System parameters - inputs and outcomes - A108
 
System parameters - inputs and outcomes
Systems knowledge article
ConvectionOvenSystemParameters-t2gmjZFp8AW2.svg
General system description breakdown
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 108
Themes
Tags
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

In many applications, the outcomes of a given process are due to a number of interacting parameters. Considering the effect of all interacting parameters together is known as a systems level approach. Such an approach can be applied to composites manufacturing[1]. In composite manufacturing processes, the interacting parameters may be attributed to the part material (M), part shape (S), tooling and consumables (T), or the equipment (E). For example, during thermal transformation, the equipment supplies temperature, pressure, and vacuum, which interacts with the material and geometrical properties of the part and tooling to affect the part quality. This includes outcomes such as final degree of cure (DOC), porosity, wrinkling, warpage, spring-in, etc. In other words, part quality is influenced by the MSTE inputs for each process step. This is a useful distinction, as it allows engineers and practitioners to simulate and tailor the appropriate parameters to pass specifications and achieve acceptable part quality.

SystemParameters-inputs&outcomes-bN3ZGMcRmMxU.svg


Any parameter of a system can be constrained physically, by specifications, or by self-imposed desires of the manufacturer/designer[2]. An example of a physical constraint would be the maximum temperature an unloaded oven can reach. This is dictated by the physical design of the oven and cannot be changed. A specification, on the other hand, can be physically changed but is in place to meet regulations. For example, a company in the supply chain for a large OEM may have process specifications imposed on them by the OEM. An example may include the cure window that the material must adhere to. Finally, a designer or manufacturer may impose their own constraints on their manufacturing processes in order to achieve their cost, rate, and quality metrics.

To understand how system parameters come together to influence the system response in a general sense refer to system interactions. For a detailed description of thermal management related system effects refer to the following pages:


Material parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to material page in Systems Catalogue

Material parameters include the material properties, material formulation (eg. dry fabric, prepreg, resin etc.), and the associated specifications for the material. The specifications define the processing requirements specific to the material system. The Manufacturer Recommended Cure Cycle (MRCC) for a given resin system is an example. The material parameters along with the shape parameters define the outcome sensitivity for the system. That is, how the part responds to the imposed boundary conditions.

Shape parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to shape page in Systems Catalogue

The shape parameters include the physical description of the part. That is, its internal and external geometry. Each of these parameters will influence the way the part behaves during processing and must be considered. For example, a thick part will take much longer to reach a uniform internal temperature as compared with a thin part. Additionally, local shape changes may influence both mechanical and thermal properties of the part.

Tooling and consumable parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to tooling and consumables page in Systems Catalogue

Combined with the equipment parameters, the tooling parameters form the boundary conditions for the part. Tooling material and thickness are important parameters as these will influence the mechanical and thermal properties of the tool, which will in turn affect outcomes such as part temperature and residual stress induced by tool-part interaction. Material properties and thickness are also of importance for the consumables in a vacuum bag setup, as they too will influence heat transfer across the bagside of the part.

Equipment parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to equipment page in Systems Catalogue

right
Equipment applies energy (eg. heat) to the tool/part assembly in order to affect it in some way.

The equipment parameters define the environment in which the tooling, part, and/or raw materials sit. Common equipment parameters that can be controlled are temperature, pressure, and vacuum. In a convective heating system, airflow is another important parameter as it will greatly influence the heat transfer coefficient. However, airflow is difficult to control unless specifically designed for.

Outcomes[edit | edit source]

Outcomes are the parameters of a system that are tracked and evaluated in order to provide metrics for acceptance. The part thermal history is a common outcome. If the intended thermal history of the part falls within the required bounds, then the outcome is deemed acceptable. If all outcomes are deemed acceptable, then part quality is achieved. If an outcome is unacceptable then the part has not achieved the intended quality and troubleshooting must take place. Ensuring that the part achieves its thermal management outcomes is highly important, as not meeting the requirements could cause defects in the final part, which may not appear until the later in the factory workflow or even once the part is in service. For example, thermal outcomes such as part temperature may have a direct or indirect effect on later processing themes, such as residual stress and dimensional control.

Many outcomes may be challenging or detrimental to measure directly. Because of this, proxy outcomes are often used. Degree of cure (DOC) is an example. While the DOC of the part is of significant concern for thermal transformation, it is difficult to measure directly without advanced or destructive measurement techniques. Therefore, part temperature during cure is typically used a proxy.

Material parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to material page in Systems Catalogue

The material parameters along with the shape parameters define the outcome sensitivity for the system. That is, how the part responds to the imposed boundary conditions.

Typical material parameters
Material type Material form
  • Dry fabric
  • Prepreg
  • Neat resin
  • Laminate
  • Sandwich panel
  • etc.

The material parameters are the type and form of the material system. Together, these influence the material properties (see the table below). The properties can generally be classified as chemical, physical, or mechanical. In the case of thermal management, important properties are shown in the table below. There are also process requirements associated with the material system, which act as constraints. These define the global specifications of the material system, such as the acceptable fibre volume fraction for example[1]. Furthermore, the process requirements also define the temperature, pressure, and vacuum history required for the material system to achieve its quality metrics. The manufacturer recommended cure cycle (MRCC), for example, represents the baseline process required to achieve the nominal mechanical properties of the material system. Additionally, there may be process requirements unique to the part itself.

Typical material properties of concern for thermal management (TM)
TM Specific heat capacity Thermal conductivity Density Fibre volume fraction Degree of cure Cure rate Heat of reaction Gelation time Glass transition temperature Degree of crystallization Crystallization rate Crystallization enthalpy Melt temperature
Chemical ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y
Physical ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y ☑Y
Mechanical

The table can be simplified by characterizing the cure or crystallization kinetics for the material system. The cure kinetics captures the degree of cure, cure rate, heat of reaction, gelation time, and glass transition temperature for thermoset resins. Similarly, crystallization kinetics encompasses the degree of crystallization, crystallization rate, crystallization enthalpy, glass transition temperature and melt temperature for thermoplastic resins. As such, the primary material properties of concern with respect to thermal management are the specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, density, fibre volume fraction, and the cure or crystallization kinetics. The former three properties and the fibre volume fraction (for composite tools) are also applicable to the tooling and consumables; they define how heat flows through the tool.

Shape parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to shape page in Systems Catalogue

The shape parameters include the physical description of the part. That is, its internal and external geometry. Each of these parameters will influence the way the part behaves during processing and must be considered. For example, a thick part may take longer to reach uniform internal temperature as compared with a thin part. Additionally, local shape changes may influence both mechanical and thermal properties of the part.

Typical shape parameters
External geometry Internal geometry
  • Thickness
  • Surface area
  • Configuration
  • Volume
  • Local shape changes

Typically, producibility requirements for the part require that the final shape be constrained. For example, in the case of L-shapes or C-channels, spring-in may result in a deviation of the laminate angle to an unacceptable level. As a result, measures to mitigate such shape changes may be taken.

Tooling and consumable parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to tooling and consumables page in Systems Catalogue

Combined with the equipment parameters, the tooling parameters form the boundary conditions for the part.

Typical tooling parameters
Geometry Material properties Layout
  • Thickness
  • Volume
  • Configuration (shape/substructure)
  • etc.
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Density
  • Specific heat capacity
  • Fibre content
  • Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)
  • Stiffness
  • Hardness
  • etc.
  • OML
  • IML
Typical consumable parameters
Geometry Material properties Location
  • Thickness
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Density
  • Specific heat capacity
  • Permeability
  • Position on part/tool

The above list is not exhaustive but covers many parameters associated with tooling and consumables. Most items can be further expanded to form a complex set of potential parameters. For example, the contour of a tool may be flat, C-shaped, L-shaped, cylindrical, etc. In many cases, the tooling and consumables are not heavily constrained for manufacturers, allowing for a number of variables to be tweaked. Tooling material and thickness are important parameters as these will influence the mechanical and thermal properties of the tool, which will in turn affect outcomes such as part temperature and residual stress induced by tool-part interaction. Material properties and thickness are also of importance for the consumables in a vacuum bag setup, as they too will influence heat transfer across the bagside of the part.

A complex part may require a complex tool, however there are practical limits as to the design of the tool. For example, very sophisticated metallic tools require challenging machining which might not be feasible. Moreover, the tool must generally be rigid enough to not deform during use. Therefore, there is often a minimum thickness requirement for the tool. Finally, the tool must be able to handle the process it is intended for. If the tool is to be involved in 500+ cure cycles, but is not durable enough, it may not be able to handle numerous temperature and pressure cycles; not to mention the use before and after cure. Similarly, the consumables must be able to withstand the processing conditions. For example, high temperature sealant tape and bagging material must be used if the process requires vacuum bagging under high temperature conditions.

Equipment parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to equipment page in Systems Catalogue

right
Equipment applies energy (eg. heat) to the tool/part assembly in order to affect it in some way.

In composites manufacturing, equipment apply energy to the material in many different ways. Mechanical work, heat, chemical, photochemical, or electrical energy are common. The mode of energy application depends on the equipment and the intended use. For example, robotic layup of prepreg imparts mechanical energy to deposit the material on the tool. Oven or room temperature curing of a part relies on the transfer of heat, whereas UV curing of a thermoset resin utilizes photochemical energy. Curing is also possible by strictly chemical energy, such as using ammonium hydroxide to cure. Finally, induction welding is an example of imparting electrical energy on a thermoplastic composite.

The equipment parameters define the environment in which the tooling, part, and/or raw materials sit. The parameters vary depending on the equipment and application. The table below represents general parameters for the given process steps. Common equipment parameters that can be controlled are temperature, pressure, and vacuum. In a convective heating system, airflow is another important parameter as it will greatly influence the heat transfer coefficient (HTC). However, airflow may be difficult to control unless specifically designed for.

Typical equipment parameters
Airflow Applied temperature Heating/cooling rate Applied pressure Applied vacuum Volume Position
Air velocity/distribution Determined by cure cycle Determined by cure cycle Determined by pressurization cycle Determined by vacuum cycle Internal volume for tool-part loads In reference to robotic layup

Depending on the controls of the equipment and the process, any one of these parameters could be a constraint. Generally, equipment constraints are defined by the production requirements and the equipment capabilities. The capabilities of the equipment are an obvious constraint. A part requiring a consolidation pressure greater than 1atm cannot be processed in an oven since an oven does not support pressure application beyond vacuum pressure. Production requirements are local specifications to support changes to production[1]. This includes increasing the throughput rate, processing rate (eg. fast cure cycles), and defining the number of parts that may be placed in given piece of equipment for a given process. For example, an autoclave may be used as a bus stop where many different parts are cured at the same time (i.e. a batch cycle), or it may be a dedicated autoclave, designed to cure one specific part at a time.

Outcomes[edit | edit source]

The outputs of a system could be any number of parameters, useful or not. Outcomes are those parameters that are tracked for evaluation to define quality and producibility. They represent the state of the system and include the relevant output parameters for each MSTE class. For most manufacturing systems, the outcomes are often associated with the shape or material, as it is the final state of the part that is of concern. For example, the part temperature or part thickness.

It is important to recall the process-structure-property relationship, when referring to outcomes. The process influences the material structure, which in turn influences the material properties. For example, if the processing temperature is too low for a given thermoset resin, there will be a lower degree of crosslinking (i.e. lower degree of cure), resulting in lower molecular weight and reduced mechanical properties. Therefore, outcomes in upstream themes, such as thermal management will impact the outcomes in downstream themes, such as residual stress and dimensional control management.

Understanding of the part outcomes and their evolution from a chemical, physical, and mechanical perspective are key in being able to demonstrate material equivalency. This is necessary in demonstrating that lab scale tests are indicative the completed structure.

Common outcomes for the part. Adapted from[1].
PART Thermal management Material deposition management Flow and consolidation management Residual stress and dimensional control management
Chemical
  • Temperature history (min/max temp, time at max temp, etc)
  • Gelation time
  • Degree of cure
Physical
  • Degree of crystallization
  • Glass transition temperature and time to vitrification
  • Melt temperature
  • Toughening precipitation
  • Crystal morphology and distribution
  • Fibre volume fraction
  • Fibre alignment/orientation
  • Laps/gaps
  • Resin-starved/resin-rich areas
  • Fibre volume fraction
  • Wrinkling/waviness (morphology, distribution, etc.)
  • Porosity and void distribution
  • Ply bridging
  • Ply thickness
Mechanical
  • Core movement/crush
  • Thermal strains
  • Cure shrinkage
  • Crystallization shrinkage
  • Microcracks, delamination, disbonding, etc.
  • Warpage
  • Spring-in

Work is ongoing on a more expansive outcome matrix, which will be posted here shortly.

Material Shape Tool Equipment
Cell filled Do we care about this parameter in the factory cell/ Can the factory cell affect or change the parameter value
Cell marked with "X" Actively measure, checking
Theme Parameter of any process Receiving Testing Storage Material deposition Thermal Transformation Demoulding Trimming and machining Inspection Assembly Coating Packaging and shipping Service
Thermal and cure/crystallization management EXTENDED OUTCOME TABLE COMING SOON
Material deposition and consolidation management
Residual stress and dimensional control management
Machine and assembly management
Quality and inspection management

Acceptable and unacceptable outcomes (defects)[edit | edit source]

An outcome may be deemed acceptable or unacceptable if it meets the producibility/process requirements of the part/material. An acceptable outcome infers part producibility. That is, the quality of the part is acceptable and may continue on to the next stage of the factory workflow. In order for producibility to be achieved, all outcomes must be deemed acceptable. If an outcome is unacceptable (i.e. it is outside the specification window), then it is considered a defect and part producibility has not been achieved; the process must be troubleshooted.

As a baseline, typical acceptance values follow those of the processing specs from the material supplier data sheets. For thermal management, this means following the manufacturer recommended cure cycle (MRCC) and tracking the necessary outcomes to ensure that the correct cycle is indeed imposed on the part. Often this will include placement of thermocouples along the part to track its temperature and heating rate throughout the process. Simple, yet powerful, outcomes to track are the minimum and maximum temperatures of the part during the cure cycle. Ensuring these fall within an acceptable threshold for an appropriate amount of time is of high value.

Outcomes of the equipment should also be defined and validated. An empty autoclave or oven airflow field represents the best case to achieve the required heating rates and hold temperatures[1]. Therefore, given an oven or autoclave, an appropriate outcome for thermal management would be the temperature history of the air within the empty convective heating system. Generally, if the required temperature history cannot be achieved when the system is void of parts and tools, then the addition of parts and tools will add thermal resistances making it more difficult to achieve the necessary temperature history of the part. An exception to this is if the heat released due to the exothermic nature of the material is enough to achieve the required temperature for the part itself.

In an ideal world, manufacturers would measure performance outcomes directly. However, this is not feasible if the measurement is destructive to the integrity of the part. As such, proxy outcomes are often used to represent the intended outcome. For example, one common method to measure the degree of cure (DOC) of a part is differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). However, this requires that a sample be taken from the final part. Not only is this time and labour intensive, but it is destructive to the part. Non-destructive techniques for measuring DOC may be employed, such as using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). However, this is an advanced technique that again increases labour and equipment costs. As such, part temperature history is a common outcome for thermoset resins because it can be used as a proxy for the final degree of cure of the part, which is the true outcome of concern.

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 [Ref] Fabris, Janna Noemi (2018). A Framework for Formalizing Science Based Composites Manufacturing Practice (Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. doi:10.14288/1.0372787.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  2. [Ref] Ashby, M.F. (2011). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-25539-5. ISBN 9781856176637.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)


About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.