The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Effect of material in a RSDM system - A275

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Effect of material in a RSDM system
Systems knowledge article
Effect-of-Material-RSDM icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 275
Themes
Relevant Classes
  • Material
Tags

Introduction[edit | edit source]

“Material” under the context of residual stress and deformation management refers to material structure and the associated material properties. As a subset of parameters that can affect RSDM, these material properties affect the stress built up within the composite parts during processing, leading to residual stresses and deformations.

Scope[edit | edit source]

This article discusses the impact of material on the residual stress and deformation of composite parts. The page links to foundational knowledge content. Important material properties such cure shrinkage and thermal expansion and contraction of different material forms are discussed.

Significance[edit | edit source]

Residual stresses, process induced deformation and dimension control of the final part should be considered from the designing and composite material selection phase. If not controlled, these factors can lead to matrix failure and unexpected dimensional changes which can significantly increase manufacturing time and cost. When a material system is selected, the material structure and associated material properties have direct impact on the part deformation during processing. An understanding of the deformation mechanisms and the roles of those material properties is highly important.

Prerequisites[edit | edit source]

Recommended documents to review before, or in parallel with this document:


Analysis[edit | edit source]

A detailed breakdown of the material structures and material properties are as following:

Effect of material anisotropy on RSDM[edit | edit source]

The main driver for composite process induced deformation is material anisotropy. After being processed at an elevated temperatures, the strain caused by resin cure shrinkage and thermal contraction in resin property dominated directions are higher than the strain in directions where fibre exists. This strain mismatch can happen on the microscale between individual fibres and matrix or on the macroscale between different directions in a laminate (for example, in the in-plane and through thickness directions). Material anisotropy is one of the major driving mechanisms of stresses and deformation.

Thermal expansion and contraction[edit | edit source]

As thermoset composites are processed with high temperature cure cycles, CTEs of the fibre and resin must be carefully evaluated to understand internal stress development. On the microscale, fibre and resin have different CTEs. Carbon fibre has a constant and very low (to slightly negative) CTE in the longitudinal direction. Whereas resin typically has higher CTE that evolves as the cure progresses.

In the context of orthotropic fibre reinforced composites, minimal internal stresses are formed during the early curing stages because resin is a viscous liquid before the onset of gelation. However, once gelled, the resin-fibre interface is established; thermal strains in resin caused by cure cycle heat ups and cool downs can result in stresses within the laminates. Generally, CTEs in the fibre directions are lower than the CTEs in directions where there are no fibre constraints and are resin dominant. Hence, when temperature changes, different thermal strains are produced.

Cure shrinkage[edit | edit source]

As cross-linking progresses, volume in the molecular arrangement and molecular chain mobility decrease. Physically, resin shrinks in volume and becomes more viscous. Like thermal strain, the cure shrinkage strain in a composite also depends heavily on fibre orientation[1][2].

Effect of core and inserts on RSDM[edit | edit source]

Core and inserts can affect the part flexural rigidity which plays an important role in deformation. In general, the thicker the core, the stiffer the parts, the more resistant it is to process induced deformation[3]. Run-out geometry around the core may also affect process induced deformation.

Effect of polymer properties on RSDM[edit | edit source]

As mechanisms of RSDM are heavily dependent on the evolution of resin properties during cure, characterizing the polymer is crucial for understanding and mitigating residual stresses and deformations. State variables of the polymer such as degree of cure, viscosity, Tg as well as various moduli determine how and how much stress is built up in a composite part. Resin heat of reaction can also significantly affects the composite thermal history which can lead to changes in properties of resin during cure.

Effect of composite properties on RSDM[edit | edit source]

Aside from the anisotropic properties mentioned above, the stiffness of the cured laminate also plays an important role in the final deformation. The stiffer the parts, the more resistant it is to process induced deformation.

Effect of fiber volume fraction gradients on RSDM[edit | edit source]

Fiber volume fraction gradient through the thickness can also significantly influence the part residual stress and deformation[4]. These stresses are mainly driven by resin chemical shrinkage and thermal shrinkage. The higher the resin content (lower fiber volume fraction) the more shrinkage and higher the stresses. This through thickness fiber volume fraction gradient is common in thick pre-preg systems that require bleeding. Bleeding is typically done on the bag side to remove excess resin. This results in the bag side being "dryer" comapred to the tool side. Fiber volume fractions of 52% on the bag side and 59% on the tool side have been observed. As the resin cures, the tool side experiences more chemical and thermal shrinkage due to being resin rich, generate higher stress.

Fiber volume fraction gradients can also occur in parts that are made with wet layup or vacuum infusion. It is common in wet layup parts that the resin or fiber are not deposited evenly, whereas in infusion, resin content is higher closer to the outlets compared to at the inlet. However, if the resin used shrinks very little and those parts are not cured at elevated temperatures, the fiber volume fraction gradients can be less of an issue.


References

  1. [Ref] Ersoy, Nuri et al. (2010). "Modelling of the spring-in phenomenon in curved parts made of a thermosetting composite". 41 (3). Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.008. ISBN 1359-835X Check |isbn= value: length (help). ISSN 1359-835X. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  2. [Ref] Ersoy, Nuri; Tugutlu, Mehmet (2009). "Cure Kinetics Modelling and Cure Shrinkage". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  3. [Ref] Kappel, Erik (2015). "Spring-in of curved CFRP/foam-core sandwich structures". 128. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.058. ISSN 0263-8223. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  4. [Ref] Campbell, F.C. (2004). Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-1-85617-415-2.X5000-X. ISBN 9781856174152.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.