The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Materials deposition and consolidation management (MDCM) - A157

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Systems Knowledge - A4Materials deposition and consolidation management (MDCM) - A157
 
Materials deposition and consolidation management (MDCM)
Systems knowledge article
MDM Icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 157
Themes
Tags
Prerequisites

Introduction[edit | edit source]


Material deposition and consolidation management (MDCM) is concerned with knowing, understanding, and managing how the constituent materials of a composite part are placed and consolidated onto the tooling. Whereas the thermal management is relatively independent of process, material deposition and consolidation management is highly dependent on the process, which is likely why most processes are colloquially named after their MDCM step. Material deposition processes can be broadly separated into two categories:

  • Deposition of the reinforcement onto the tool followed by the deposition of matrix (Tool + Reinforcement + Matrix)
  • Reinforcement and Matrix combined, then deposited onto the tool ((Reinforcement + Matrix) + Tool)


Regardless of the manufacturing process, material deposition and consolidation have direct impact on cost and final part quality. Depending on the process, material form and part shape, deposition and consolidation can consume a huge amount of time and resources in a manufacturing system, especially for complex and high performance applications. The combined effect of the material deposition and consolidation and the subsequent thermal transformation steps will determine local porosity, resin volume fraction leading to either resin rich or resin starved areas, and fibre misalignment.


Significance[edit | edit source]

Link to the outcome matrix

Material deposition and consolidation is a major cost driver in composite manufacturing. The capital and overhead cost of MDCM accounts for 40 - 60 % of the total cost depending on part complexity and production volume[1]. Several manufacturing outcomes are directly related to MDCM. This includes wrinkling, fibre waviness, Fibre volume fraction, porosity (void content), residual stress and others. Further, material deposition rate can directly impact throughput. Choosing the correct manufacturing process and appropriate processing parameters is essential to a composite manufacturing system.

Scope[edit | edit source]

This page describes MDCM from a systems level perspective. Since material deposition and consolidation is heavily process dependent, the section is expanded into a comprehensive list of composite manufacturing processes. Two representative processes, vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM) from liquid composite moulding and hand layup pre-preg/autoclave are discussed in detail. These two examples demonstrate using the MSTE approach to categorize processing parameter which can affect the MDCM outcomes. Following this approach, the effects of each MSTE parameter class on the MDCM outcomes are analyzed and illustrated in the following subpages:


Effect-of-Material-MDM icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Effect-of-Shape-MDM icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Effect-of-Tooling-MDM icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Effect-of-Equipment-MDM icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Effect of material in a materials deposition and consolidation management system
Effect of shape in a materials deposition and consolidation management system
Effect of tooling in a materials deposition and consolidation management system
Effect of equipment in a materials deposition and consolidation management system


Systems level approach[edit | edit source]

Overview[edit | edit source]

Material deposition and consolidation management is highly dependent on the material deposition process. Material deposition processes can be broadly separated into two categories:

[Explain the physics in relation to the outcomes in two phases: first one only for first category, second true for both] and link to the example below (replace ex. 2 with autoclave process).


Example 1: Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM)/resin infusion (VARI)[edit | edit source]

Practice for developing a thermal transformation process stepPractice for developing a thermal transformation process stepPractice for developing a thermal transformation process stepVA-RTM and Light RTM Factory Workflow-8Xgd4kPBNzPm.svg


MSTE under the context of MDCM for Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM)/resin infusion (VARI) are:

Material[edit | edit source]

  • Material Structure
    • +Reinforcement sizing - sizing serves the interface between the reinforcement and the matrix. Sizing can affect how the reinforcement is impregnated *NOTE: in this case, the term sizing has nothing to do with the physical size of the fibre
    • +Reinforcement architecture - tow size can affect the impregnation. Large tow size, potential porosity within the tow. Small tow size, potential porosity between the tows (Ask Casey for figure/schematic)
  • Material properties
    • Fibre-bed drapability - how well fibre will conform to the shape of the tool. Plays a role in fibre waviness
    • Fibre-bed permeability - Along with Viscosity (resin) and pressure differential, determines the rate at which resin infused the fibre
    • Viscosity (resin) - Along with Fibre-bed permeability and pressure differential, determines the resin deposition rate
  • Consumables

Vacuum bags, spiral tubing, peel ply, flow media and other consumables play crucial roles in VARTM. Consolidation of VARTM is solely provided by vacuum pressure via the vacuum bag. Spiral tubing and flow media assist the resin deposition (flow) to fully impregnate the reinforcement.

Shape[edit | edit source]

  • Geometry - VARTM can adopt a wide range of size and shape complexities. In theory, a shape is achievable if the reinforcement can be deposited and resin flow can reach. In practice, sharp/tight turns and undercuts are difficult to fully infuse. Reinforcement is typically deposited manually if the shape is simple. A small amount of adhesive (often 'spray glue') is sometimes used to stop the consumables and reinforcements from shifting. For complex shapes, reinforcement preforms can be used.
    • Thickness - affects the through thickness resin flow front profile
    • Corners and curvature - tight convex corners raises pressure, leading to thinner part. Tight concave corner can potentially cause resin pooling and resin rich areas

Tool[edit | edit source]

  • Tool determines the shape

Equipment[edit | edit source]

  • Fibre cutting equipment - potentially cause fibre waviness
  • Fibre handling equipment - potentially cause fibre waviness and misalignment
  • Vacuum pump - determines the vacuum level and consolidation force exerted on the part


Example 2: Hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing[edit | edit source]

Practice for developing a thermal transformation process stepPractice for developing a thermal transformation process stepAutoclave OoA Factory Workflow-8Xgd4kPBNzPm.svg

Depositing pre-preg material using hand layup is intrinsically slower and more prone to errors and uncertainties comparing to Automated fibre placement (AFP) or Automated tape layup (ATL). However, for small and intricate parts, hand layup can be a lot more robust for manipulating the pre-preg sheet onto complex contours. MSTE under the context of MDCM for Hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing - A291 are:

Material[edit | edit source]

  • Material Structure
    • Reinforcement architecture - Unidirectional or woven; tow size and deposition rate
    • Inserts - The use of inserts complicates the MDCM, depending on the insert type, sealant or other insert associated consumables are potential required. Potential cure in multiple stages.
  • Material properties
    • Fibre-bed drapability - how well fibre will conform to the shape of the tool. Plays a role in fibre waviness
    • Viscosity (resin) - Along with Fibre-bed permeability, determines the resin deposition rate. Function of temperature, warming up the pre-preg softens the resin, making hand layup easier.
  • Consumables

Vacuum bags, breather cloth and release films are used during de-bulking and curing. The layup is typically debulked every three to five layers depending on the shape complexity. Debulking compacts the layup and removes entrapped air between the pre-preg layers. Debulking can also be perform at elevated temperatures (65.5°C to 93.3 °C or 150 °F to 200 °F) to soften the resin for better consolidation[1].

Shape[edit | edit source]

  • Thickness - The thicker the part, the more layers of pre-preg required, longer it takes to complete layup
  • Layup - more complex the layup, lower the deposition rate, higher uncertainties and chance for error
  • Corners and curvature - tight convex corners raises pressure, leading to thinner part. Tight concave corner can potentially cause resin pooling and resin rich areas
  • Gapping - when gapping is required, hand layup can be inaccurate which may cause resin rich areas or other defects

Tool[edit | edit source]

  • Tool determines the shape

Equipment[edit | edit source]

  • Fibre cutting equipment - potentially cause fibre waviness
  • Fibre handling equipment - potentially cause fibre waviness and misalignment
  • Vacuum pump - determines the vacuum level and consolidation force exerted on the part
  • Autoclave - As temperature increases initially Viscosity (resin) decrease, along with the autoclave pressure, part is consolidated


Manufacturing outcomes/MDCM outcomes[edit | edit source]


Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 [Ref] Campbell, F.C. (2004). Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-1-85617-415-2.X5000-X. ISBN 9781856174152.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.