The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing - A291

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
The factory - A159Factory cells (where and how) - A208Material deposition - A182Hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing - A291
 
Hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 291
Prerequisites

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Despite continued advancements in other material deposition methods, hand layup prepreg remains a big part of the composites manufacturing industry. Hand layup involves skilled laminators forming individual prepreg plies layer by layer into various geometries. This process can produce complex and high performance parts, however, it can be costly and operator dependent.

Significance[edit | edit source]

Hand layup is one of the most widely used prepreg deposition methods. It is capable of producing highly complex features due to advanced human dexterity and can easily adapt to new designs and design changes. Understanding the workers' techniques can help designers better design parts with manufacturability in mind. These insights can not only accelerate new worker training but also shed light on automating the layup process using automated tape laying (ATL) and automated fiber placement (AFP). [1]

Scope[edit | edit source]

This page provides an overview of the hand layup process. The process is explained from the MSTE perspective to include important variables for hand layup. Challenges associated with hand layup and other key considerations from Thermal and cure/crystallization management (TM), Materials deposition and consolidation management (MDCM) and Residual stress and dimensional control management (RSDM) are also discussed.

Prerequisites[edit | edit source]

Recommended documents to review before, or in parallel with this document:

Process Demonstration[edit | edit source]

The video below provides an introduction to prepreg layup. It provides a brief overview of how to handle the material, how to apply it to the tool, how to perform a debulking step and the effect of common processing issues on the outcome of a part.

Process description[edit | edit source]

Ply cutting[edit | edit source]

In the case of hand layup, the room temperature prepreg is cut into the desired size and shape before layup. The cutting is done in a clean room (see Prepreg - A171 for more detail) and can be either manual or automated. Hand cutting prepreg can be done using knives and guides. Templates (typically made from aluminum or steel) can be fabricated to guide the hand cutting. It maybe be unavoidable to have chips or particles being shaved off the template and embedded into the prepreg. The disadvantage of manual cutting includes: labor intensive, time consuming, poor material utilization, and risk of fiber orientation errors. Automated ply cutting is used in most high volume production environments. Among many type of cutters (lasers, steel rule dies, water jets), reciprocating knives and ultrasonic cutters are the most common in the composites industry.[2] The cut prepreg plies are then labelled (often by automated cutting machine), sorted and sent to subsequent layup. This process is commonly referred to as 'kitting'.

Ply deposition[edit | edit source]

The hand layup is typically performed in a clean room, similar to the environment of the cutting step. The operator then manually deposits each prepreg ply onto the tool or previous ply often with the assistance of a hand held tool (see tool of hand layup below) to firmly pack down the laminate to avoid/reduce air pockets[1]. The sequence and orientation of each prepreg ply and consumable material should comply with the engineering drawing or work order. Backing paper and release film should be removed before the prepreg is applied. Some specifications may require the prepreg ply to be applied with the backing paper side face up or face down. Templates, guides or laser projection units can be used to guide the layup. Templates can be inconvenient when the part is large or has many layers of different sizes and shapes. Guiding holes outside of the effective part boundary can be cut into the prepreg to match the pins on the mold. These "ears" are then machined when the part is cured. Laser projection technologies are widely used these days to projects the outline of the next ply at appropriate location with high accuracy (± 0.015 - 0.04 inches)[2]. The projections are generated with CAD software and are capable of taking the complex contours into consideration. During the hand layup, if applicable, sensors such as thermocouples or pressure sensors can be embedded.

Hand layup is prone to defects such as fiber bridging and winkles or wavienss when the part geometry is complex. See Prepreg - A171 for more information on fiber bridging. Squeegees and rollers can be used to remove wrinkles in hand-layup. Hot air guns or irons can soften the prepreg, increase its tack and thus makes it easier for operators to layup with less wrinkles. However, the material temperature should generally not exceed 65.5 °C (150 °F).[2]

When a flat ply of prepreg with limited extensibility is formed into a concave or convex surface, the ply needs to deform. Unidirectional prepreg plies can bend or be stretched/compressed in the direction perpendicular to the fiber direction in a very limited amount. Whereas a woven prepreg ply allows the fiber tows to rotate and slide against each other, i.e. shear, so that the ply can extend and contract in the ±45° directions. Given one geometry, the shape of deforming a ply into that geometry is not unique and can depend on the worker's techniques. If the deformation exceeds the prepreg extensibility limit, slits, darts, cuts or folds need to be made to accommodate the material deficits or material excess, which can significantly decrease the structure performance[1].

Vacuum bagging and compaction[edit | edit source]

The vacuum bagging in hand layup autoclave prepreg process is similar to that in general prepreg processing. See Prepreg - A171 for more detail. For out-of-autoclave prepreg however, this is an extremely crucial step because vacuum is the sole source of compaction. Out-of-autoclave, OoA (aka. vacuum-bag-only, VBO) prepregs rely on specific features in the prepreg microstructure and processing techniques to achieve low porosity. Intentionally designed partial impregnation (dry areas) create paths for the entrapped air during layup to be removed. These paths, sometimes referred to as "engineered vacuum channels (EVaCs)" allow the gas inside the laminate to migrate and to be removed through the laminate boundaries during de-bulking and early stages of the cure. Therefore, permeable boundaries such as dry fiberglass, cork must be used to allow VBO prepreg to "breath".[3] [4]

Thermal transformation[edit | edit source]

After vacuum bagging and sufficient debulking, the parts undergo thermal transformation. This is typically achieved through an autoclave. However, increasing out-of-autoclave (OoA) prepregs have gained acceptance because they are more cost efficient, have less overall emission as well as capable of producing less than 1% void content parts with autoclave-quality. With OoA prepregs, the parts are either cured using an oven or heating blankets while being vacuum bagged. Not only can OoA parts be cured with less compaction pressure (1 atmospheric pressure), they can sometime be cured at lower temperature (93°C/200°F or 121°C/250°F) compared to the autoclave counterpart (85 psi with 177°C/350°F). Heated tools can also be used to cure OoA prepreg materials.

Practice for developing a thermal transformation process stepPractice for developing a thermal transformation process stepAutoclave OoA Factory Workflow-8Xgd4kPBNzPm.svg

Material of hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing[edit | edit source]

Graphite/epoxy prepreg is the most common material for this process. See Prepreg - A171 for more detail. Depending on the fibre architecture, prepreg weight and matrix materials, the prepreg can have different characteristics. Also if inserts are involved in the layup, the hand layup difficulty can also increase.

As mentioned above in ply deposition, unidirectional or woven prepreg can deform differently to accommodate the part geometry. In general, the heavier the prepreg (measured in grams per square meter, gsm), the harder it is to hand layup because the material is denser and more difficult to conform to intricate features. The right amount of tack from the matrix can help workers laying the material more efficiently. Too little tack can cause the prepreg ply to not adhere to the previous layer or the tool surface, making it difficult to create the desired geometry. Heating may be required to increase the tackiness, which ultimately takes more time. Too much tack can also present challenges if a worker tries to adjust or remove a ply that has already been laid down.

Tool of hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing[edit | edit source]

Tools for hand layup are typically one sided, open molds on which prepreg is laid on top[5]. Caul plates can be used on the vacuum bag side to provide better surface finish and more uniform part thickness. Depending on the application, tools for hand layup can be made from a wide range of materials such as wood, plastic, metal and composite materials. When selecting tooling materials, aside from making sure the material can withstand the prepreg processing condition (temperature and pressure), part thermal management, residual stress and dimensional control must be considered.

Because the OOA prepreg can be cured at lower temperature and pressure, tools made for autoclave which typically have complex substructures can be simplified [6]. Residual stresses and process induced deformation due to tool-part coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch can also be better controlled because the temperature gradient is smaller.

Equipment of hand layup prepreg (Autoclave/Out-of-autoclave) processing[edit | edit source]

Vacuum pump[edit | edit source]

Autoclave[edit | edit source]

Link to Autoclave

Oven[edit | edit source]

Link to Oven


Application[edit | edit source]

  • Aerospace
  • High performance automotive
  • Sport/recreation equipment
  • Marine

Advantages[edit | edit source]

  • Human dexterity is capable of laying up intricate and complex geometries which may be impossible for ATL, filament winding or AFP
  • Lower capital cost compared to ATL, filament winding or AFP

Disadvantages[edit | edit source]

  • Potential for human error
  • Labor intensive
  • Limited part size by human reach
  • Slow material deposition rate compared to ATL, filament winding or AFP
  • Lower accuracy in ply orientation and position compared to ATL, filament winding or AFP
  • Less control over compaction pressure and temperature during deposition compared to ATL, filament winding of AFP

Troubleshooting[edit | edit source]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 [Ref] Elkington, M. et al. (2015). "Hand layup: understanding the manual process". 1 (3). Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/20550340.2015.1114801. ISSN 2055-0359. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 [Ref] Campbell, F.C. (2004). Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-1-85617-415-2.X5000-X. ISBN 9781856174152.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  3. [Ref] Centea, T. et al. (2015), A review of out-of-autoclave prepregs - Material properties, process phenomena, and manufacturing considerations, doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029, ISSN 1359-835XCS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  4. [Ref] Lucas, Scott et al. (2010). "Critical property characterization and fabrication of CYCOM® 5320-1 T40-800B unitape for non-autoclave manufacturing of primary aerospace structure". ISBN 9781934551080. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  5. [Ref] Mazumdar, Sanjay K. (2002). Composites Manufacturing materials, product and processing engineering. ISBN 0-8493-0585-3.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  6. [Ref] GARDINER, GINGER (2011). "Out-of-autoclave prepregs Hype or revolution". Retrieved 20 January 2022.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.