Testing - A178
Testing | |
---|---|
Document Type | Article |
Document Identifier | 178 |
Tags |
Introduction[edit | edit source]
This page provides an overview of the typical tests performed to obtain the properties of and characterize a composite material. It introduces and links to the equipment found in a test lab including analytical equipment such as a DSC, DMA, TMA, TGA, FTIR, Rheometer, etc. and mechanical testing equipment such as load frames and fixtures. Testing steps are support activities within the factory. That is, they are not directly involved in the processing of a composite part, but support those activities that are directly involved.
See also Foundational method documents in Foundational Knowledge on how to perform tests to determine different material properties and the AIM event webinar: Composite materials engineering webinar session 12 - Testing.
Background[edit | edit source]
ASTM D4762 provides an extensive list of the standards that govern various types of testing for polymer matrix composite materials. However, a small set of specific material properties are required for analysis when designing composite parts. The properties of interest are:
- Tensile strength, modulus, and Poisson's ratio (see Tensile Testing - M117)
- Compressive strength, and modulus
- Shear strength, and modulus
Watch this AIM event webinar to learn more about these properties and how they are used: Parameters for Structural Analysis of Composites.
Some secondary tests may also be performed as part of material characterization and/or design activities. These properties are usually used for material comparison/screening or quality control purposes, as they are not directly input into standard composite analysis.
- Flexural strength and modulus
- Short beam shear
- Glass transition temperature (see Glass transition temperature (Tg) - A210)
Application[edit | edit source]
For all types of tests, the method of specimen preparation is extremely important. Divergence from the specimen dimensions required by the ASTM standards introduces the potential for inappropriate specimen failure modes and variability in the results. Appropriate preparation methods must be used to ensure that the specimens meet the required tolerances and have not been damaged by the machining process. Adhering to the test standard also allows for direct comparison to other results obtained under those specifications, perhaps from a completely different laboratory.
Refer to the following list for brief description of the mechanical properties measured in the tests:
- $$E_i^+$$ : Tensile modulus
- $$E_i^-$$ : Compressive modulus
- $$E_f$$ : Flexural stiffness
- $$G_i$$ : Shear modulus
- $$\nu_{ij}$$ : Poisson's ratio
- $$S_i^+$$ : Tensile strength
- $$S_i^-$$ : Compressive strength
- $$S_f$$ : Flexural strength
Tensile Strength and Modulus[edit | edit source]
This test is performed to determine the in-plane tensile properties of composite materials. Extensometers, strain gauges, and/or DIC methods are commonly used to take strain measurements for modulus and Poisson’s ratio calculations. Depending on the type of reinforcement in the composite, the specimens may either be rectangular strips or dog-bone shaped. Tensile properties are typically fibre-dominated. For more information on how to carry out this test, see Tensile Testing - M117.
Test | Properties Measured | Specimen Type | Description/Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM D3039 | $$E_i^+, \nu_{ij}, S_i^+$$ | Rectangular | Suitable for random, discontinuous, and highly oriented reinforcements. Use extensometers or strain gauges for strain measurements. | Tabbing may be required. Tabs must be parallel and edges perpendicular with the gage. | Preferred for most use cases. G10 glass fibre laminate is commonly used for the tabs. Bondline thickness typically between 0.5 to 1.2 mm. |
ASTM D5083 | $$E_i^+, \nu_{ij}, S_i^+$$ | Rectangular | Technically equivalent to ISO 527-4. No tabbing required. Use extensometers for strain measurements. | Only suitable for plastics and low-modulus composites | Straight-sided alternative so ASTM D638. |
ASTM D638 | $$E_i^+, \nu_{ij}, S_i^+$$ | Dog-bone | Test specimens easy to prepare. Technically equivalent to ISO 527-1. Use extensometers for strain measurements. | Should not be used for composites with highly oriented reinforcements | Also not recommended for high modulus composites. |
Compressive Strength and Modulus[edit | edit source]
This testing is performed to determine the in-plane compressive properties of composite materials. Strain gauges are used to take strain measurements for calculating Young's modulus in compression and Poisson's ratio. The test uses a rectangular specimen. Compression properties are resin-dominated.
Test | Properties Measured | Specimen Type | Description/Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM D6641 | $$E_i^-, \nu_{ij}, S_i^-$$ | Rectangular | Specimens may be tabbed or untabbed. Specimens are loaded by a combination of end and shear loading. | Composites containing more than 50% 0° plies must be tabbed. Limited to composites that are balanced and symmetric and contain at least one 0° ply. | Most common method due to ease of use and simplicity. Suitable for continuous fibre composites. AKA Combined Loading Compression (CLC) |
ASTM D3410 | $$E_i^-, \nu_{ij}, S_i^-$$ | Rectangular | Shear loading - Typically produces the most repeatable results. | Second most common method. The fixture is expensive and cumbersome to use. AKA Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute (IITRI). Requires perfectly square ends on the specimens as it is end-loaded. | Widely accepted in the industry. |
ASTM D695 | $$E_i^-, \nu_{ij}, S_i^-$$ | Rectangular | The test is required to show equivalence to a test done 20-30 years ago (i.e., replacing an aircraft part that was developed with test data from ASTM D695 in the 70s). Good for very thin specimens. | The test is not common today. | Originally came from the plastic industry. |
Shear Strength and Modulus[edit | edit source]
This testing is performed to determine the in-plane shear properties of composite materials. The testing is performed on a load frame, and uses strain gauges to take strain measurements for modulus calculations. The test uses a rectangular specimen with centrally located v-notches.
Test | Properties Measured | Specimen Type | Description/Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM D7078 | $$G_i$$ | Rectangular with v-notches | Provides shear strength and modulus if strain gauges are used. Generally does not require tabs. | Specimens can be difficult to machine. Results are less susceptible to how square the edges are since the specimen is held in shear. Specimen is larger compared to Iosipescu test. Biaxial strain gauges required to obtain modulus data. | Recommended when shear modulus is required. Produce pure uniform shear stress |
ASTM D5379 | $$G_i$$ | Iosipescu shear | Provides shear strength and modulus if strain gauges are used. Generally does not require tabs. | Specimen is loaded on it's edges so the edges must be square, therefore preparation is important. | Recommended when shear modulus is required. Produces pure uniform shear stress |
ASTM D3518 | $$G_i$$ | +-45 Tension shear | The specimen is similar to D3039. | More historic than anything. Does not produce pure uniform shear stress. | Used for non-technical reasons (fixture availability) or for quality control. |
ASTM D2344 | $$G_i$$ | Short beam shear | Interlaminar shear compared to the other in-plane tests. | Does not produce pure uniform shear stress. | Recommended for quality control/comparative analysis. |
Flexural Strength and Modulus[edit | edit source]
This testing is performed to determine the flexural strength and modulus properties of composite materials. The test results can be compared with the composite analysis results to provide an assessment of the accuracy of the model. The testing is performed on a load frame, and uses a deflectometer to take deflection measurements for modulus calculations. The test uses a rectangular specimen.
Test | Properties Measured | Specimen Type | Description/Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM D7264 | $$E_f, S_f$$ | Rectangular | 3 point and 4 point bending. 4 point is preferred as it reduces shear stress in the loading region but requires a higher test load. Specimens are easy to prepare and test. Suitable for random, discontinuous, and continuous reinforcements. | Loading nose/supports can create stress concentrations. Results are affected by specimen geometry, support span, and loading rate. | |
ASTM D790 | $$E_f, S_f$$ | Rectangular | Specimens easy to prepare and test. 3 point bend condition. | Loading nose/supports can create stress concentrations. Results are affected by specimen geometry, support span, and loading rate. | Support span of 16:1 (depth to thickness) commonly used for plastics. Support span of 32:1 commonly used for high modulus composites. Often used for quality control purposes. |
Glass Transition Temperature[edit | edit source]
This test is performed to determine the glass transition temperature of a material. The glass transition temperature is used, among others, to define the service temperature of the composite part. The test can be performed on three different pieces of equipment, as outlined below.
Test | Properties Measured | Specimen Type | Description/Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM D7028 | Rectangular | Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) method for determining Tg using a 3 point bend condition. One of the major fibre directions must be parallel to the length of the specimen. Specimens are larger than for the other two Tg tests. Tg is based on mechanical response of specimen over the desired temperature range. See Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA) - A344 for more information. | Specialized equipment required (DMA). Results are sensitive to test parameters and moisture content of specimen. | Meant for composites with continuous, oriented, high modulus reinforcements. This method is usually preferred for determining the Tg of a composite for quality control methods. | |
ASTM E1356 | Rectangular | Thermomechanical Analysis (TMA) method for determining Tg by measuring the change in dimensions over a temperature range that includes the Tg. The slopes of the probe displacement before and after the Tg are used to extrapolate the transition. See Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA) - A329 for more information]] | TMA probe can sink into the material when it is above its Tg. This will affect the measurements. Care must be taken that the probe does not get stuck in the sample. | Meant for amorphous materials or partially crystalline materials. | |
ASTM D3418 | less than 20 mg | Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) method for determination of transition temperatures and enthalpies of fusion and crystallization of polymers. The normal operating temperature range is from the cryogenic region to 600°C. Certain equipment allows the temperature range to be extended. See A192 for more information]] | Interpreting DSC results requires expertise. Factors such as heating rate, sample mass, and calibration can influence the DSC measurements | Meant for a wide range of materials. |
For more information on the common methods of destructive and non-destructive testing and how to navigate through the myriad options, see Composite materials engineering webinar session 12 - Testing - A131.
Explore this area further
Related pages
Page type | Links |
---|---|
Introduction to Composites Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents | |
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Knowledge Articles | |
Systems Knowledge Method Documents | |
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Catalogue Articles | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment | |
Practice Documents | |
Case Studies | |
Perspectives Articles |
|
About | Help |
![CKN KPC logo](/KPC/images/thumb/0/0f/CKN-KPC_Logo_FullColour-RGB-7JPTLqrLhprS6S.png/250px-CKN-KPC_Logo_FullColour-RGB-7JPTLqrLhprS6S.png)
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.