The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Composite properties - A214

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
 
Composite properties
Foundational knowledge article
Material properties-UakV3h9hweWZ.svg
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 214
Themes
Tags

Overview[edit | edit source]

This page provides links to composite properties. In the Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC), composite properties are defined as properties that describe the combined or homogenized composite material.

For a composite, its properties are influenced by a combination from both the reinforcement and matrix material constituents.

Below are composite property pages found in the KPC:

Chemical Properties[edit | edit source]

Heat of reaction (composite)[edit | edit source]

The heat of reaction \(H_R\) of a composite material is dependent on its matrix component. As the heat of reaction is referenced to the total weight of the material, for a composite it is proportional to the weight fraction of the resin matrix.

\(H_{R(composite)}=(mass\, fraction\, resin)\, \times\, H_{R(resin)}\)

KPC page for heat of reaction (composite) coming soon.

Degree of cure (composite)[edit | edit source]

While degree of cure (DOC) is a description of the matrix state, there are several points of discussion when considering the DOC of a composite.

Prepreg DOC

The as-received state of the matrix in a prepreg material is not 0 (fully unreacted). As a byproduct of the prepregging process, the matrix has already partially begun its reaction process. However, this initial DOC value is generally low, often assumed to be 0 or only a slightly advanced value, if proper storage and handling has been observed in its thermal history, that prevent the thermoset resin matrix reaction from having advanced substantially.

Cure kinetic changes

With the addition of the composite reinforcement material to the resin matrix, compared to considering only the matrix on its own, changes to the resin cure kinetics can occur and may result in a different degree of cure than expected.

The simple presence of the reinforcement material itself alters the thermal behaviour of the material system; influencing both the heat energy transported to and away from the curing resin – potentially altering the cure kinetics behaviour of the resin system.

The reinforcement material itself may also become directly involved in the resin reaction. Even inert reinforcement materials, may have an unintended influence. For example, reinforcement fibres are typically produced with a proprietary sizing coating that can interact with the resin curing reaction (as the sizing material is generally unknown, this is usually determined experimentally).

KPC page for degree of cure (composite) coming soon.

Crystallization (composite)[edit | edit source]

The presence of the reinforcement material can influence the crystallization behaviour of a thermoplastic matrix in the combined composite material. The reinforcement material has both the potential to both promote and hinder the crystallization process.

Promoting crystallization, reinforcement can act as nucleation sites for the initiation of the crystallization process. Hindering the crystallization process, the reinforcement can act as a volumetric physical constraint, limiting the crystal structure growth.

KPC page for crystallization (composite) coming soon.

Physical Properties[edit | edit source]

Specific heat capacity (composite)[edit | edit source]

The heat capacity of a composite material is a combination of the heat capacity of both the reinforcement and matrix constituents. A rule of mixtures approach is appropriate, where the combined heat capacity is proportional to the amount of reinforcement and matrix.

Click here to visit the general Heat Capacity KPC page.

Thermal conductivity (composite)[edit | edit source]

The thermal conductivity of a composite material is a combination of the thermal conductivity of both the reinforcement and matrix constituents.

When the thermal conductivity of both the reinforcement and matrix (generally assumed the case for polymer matrices) constituents is the same in all directions, a rule a rule of mixtures approach is appropriate. Here, the combined thermal conductivity of the composite material is proportional to the amount of reinforcement and matrix.

For composites containing reinforcements where the thermal properties vary greatly on direction (e.g. fibrous reinforcement), the combined thermal conductivity is dependent on the direction of heat flow. In the fibre in-plane direction, a rule of mixtures approach is appropriate. However, in the transverse fibre direction, other approaches to determine the resulting thermal conductivity of the composite material must be applied.

Click here to visit the general thermal conductivity KPC page (modelling of the thermal conductivity for combined composite materials is introduced).

Mechanical Properties[edit | edit source]

Viscosity (composite)[edit | edit source]

While it is common practice to isolate and examine the viscosity of the resin matrix component on its own, it is important to consider the influence of the other composite constituent materials when the entire combined system of the matrix and the reinforcement materials are considered together as a whole viscous material.

When examining the composite material system as a whole, the addition of the reinforcement fibres has an enormous influence viscoelastic response of the material system. The fibres are able to resist shear deformation in proportion to the shear modulus of the fibre bed due to the waviness of the fibres, with this effect being higher for high volume fraction composites [1]. The fibre bed’s ability to absorb and dissipate the applied shear forces acts to essentially “thicken” the viscous behavioural response of the fibre/resin composite material. As a result, the effective viscosity of the composite material is much higher when compared to examining solely the resin viscosity on its own.

Measured increases in G’’ of several orders of magnitude have been shown in the literature when comparing prepreg viscoelastic response in comparison to neat resin (same resin system) response in oscillatory rheometer tests [1]. The measured parameter G’’ from oscillatory rheometer tests characterizes viscous portion of a material's viscoelastic behaviour [2].

At low shear rates\[\mu = \eta' = \frac{G''}{\omega}\]

Where,

\(\eta' = \) Dynamic viscosity

\(G'' = \) Viscous modulus

\(\omega = \) Angular frequency

KPC page for viscosity (composite) coming soon.

Elastic moduli (composite)[edit | edit source]

The mechanics of composite materials is inherently complex as it entails the interaction between its multiple different materials. Prediction of the composite material’s mechanical behaviour involves analysis at several size scales: micro-, mes-, and macro- mechanics.

The mechanical analysis of composite materials spans multiple size-scales. Analysis involves scales ranging from the small micro- and mesoscale, up to the larger macro-, and structural scale.

Micro and mesomechanics allows for the determination of elastic moduli at the ply or lamina level for a composite material.

Click here to learn about elastic moduli (composite).

Property Measurement[edit | edit source]

For methods to obtain material property values, please see the Foundational Methods Documents page:

Link to Foundational Method Documents page

Other Material Properties[edit | edit source]

Explore this area further

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles

References

  1. 1.01.1 [Ref] Thorpe, Ryan J. (2013). Experimental Characterization of the Viscoelastic Behavior of a Curing Epoxy Matrix Composite from Pre-Gelation to Full Cure. MASc thesis (Thesis). doi:10.14288/1.0073820.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  2. [Ref] Anton Paar. "Basics of rheology". Retrieved 21 January 2021.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.