The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Selecting Functional Requirements - P152.0

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
 
Selecting Functional Requirements
Practice document
Document Type Practice
Document Identifier 152
Tags
Objective functions
CostMaintain
RateMaintain
QualityMaintain
MSTE workflow Development
Prerequisites

Introduction[edit | edit source]

MSTEP "House" illustrating the framework and interactions between all the different components that make up the development process, with the function on top.

The first step to creating a composite product is to establish the framework and constraints to work within. This page will describe some of the functional requirements that a product may have and how that may affect the continuation of the development process. This list aims to briefly describe some common design and manufacturing requirements that should be considered and quantified before beginning further development steps. There are many considerations outside of this list more specific to your application, this page is meant to provide a starting point and highlight some of the important requirements.

Requirements[edit | edit source]

Production Volumes[edit | edit source]

When planning and initializing a factory it is important to predict and build for the correct production volume. If the factory is too small, you may not be able to meet demand, but if it is too large it is a source of a big loss in capital.

Geometry and Dimensional Accuracy[edit | edit source]

The requirements for geometry may be very confined or relatively open depending on application, to define these requirements early will guide the rest of the development process for the composite product. The dimensional accuracy of the final part will play a part in deciding tooling type, resin and material system as well as post cure processing. If the dimensional accuracy requirement is set to be very accurate, the post cure machining can rapidly drive up the cost of the production.

Assembly Requirements and Interactions with Other Parts[edit | edit source]

If the composite is to be a part of a much larger structure or a product is composed of many smaller composite parts, the methodology of how to join the various components together must be considered. In addition to this, the interaction between different material systems must be characterized and considered for the development process.

Surface Finish[edit | edit source]

The surface finish requirements will have an influence on tooling and bagging choice, if a gel coat is needed and if the part needs to be painted before it is completed.

Load Cases[edit | edit source]

The load cases requirements come from the predicted loads that the part will see during its lifetime. Attention should not only be given to the magnitude of load, but also the direction of load as this will influence fibre direction in the part. [1]. This will have a heavy influence on the material and resin system, as well as the shape design. To read more about strength calculations, see Micro-Mechanics and Macro-Mechanics.

Deflection Limits[edit | edit source]

A subsidiary of load cases, the deflection limits is how much the part is allowed to elastically deform under service loads. Some applications will allow for a large amount of deflection for shock absorption, whilst others will require next to no deflection for stability.

Lifetime Requirements[edit | edit source]

The requirements for how long the part is to be in service is a vital to determining Fatigue Limits and damage tolerances.

Environmental Conditions[edit | edit source]

The predicted environmental conditions that the part will be operating in is vital when selecting material and resin system. This involves temperature concerns as both high and low temperatures can adversely affect composites and wet conditions can cause moisture absorption into the composite. Other factors such as UV exposure and chemical contact should also be considered.

Weight[edit | edit source]

Weight is often one of the most important objectives, and a major factor when choosing composites with a high specific strength and stiffness. It is important to also consider additional weight due to joints, damage tolerance, coating, and moisture gain, among other factors, during service of the product.

Regulatory Requirements, Laws and Standards[edit | edit source]

An important aspect of the development process is not only to satisfy the structural requirements for a part, but also the relevant laws and regulations for where the product is to be used. This is also the case for certification of the components if the end application requires it. These types of requirements are important in the development process and they also come into play later as the need for testing will arise, whether it is through coupon testing or full-scale prototype testing.

Cost[edit | edit source]

A vital aspect of developing a part is that the price of manufacturing must must be viable. The cost of manufacturing includes the cost of labor and overhead, materials and tooling as well as equipment and other capital costs. Costing will guide the feasibility of choosing a manufacturing process; if a high initial investment is economically viable, if there is already equipment that is available and the product must be developed for a specific process or some requirements need to be altered to conform to the costing requirement. See AIM event recording on Costing composite parts.

Reparability[edit | edit source]

A challenge with composite parts is the low potential for repairs. The component design needs to take into account if repair is an option and to what extent a part can be repaired.

Handling[edit | edit source]

The handling refers to the fibre and matrix system during production and how it is to be applied to the tool. For example, if choosing a pre-impregnated (pre-preg) fibre and resin system, the conformability and tack are important to consider. The conformability dictates how easily the material is to drape over contours and applied into corners. The tack, is how sticky the pre-preg is and how well it sticks to the tool and subsequent plies. If the handling of your material system is too difficult or takes a lot of time, the production costs will increase rapidly and rates will decrease.

Generic Development Guidelines[edit | edit source]

The following is a list of generic rule-of-thumb, compiled through years of experience with composites product development[2].

  • Plies which do not extend to the edge of the part should be inside the ply stack and should not end on the laminate surface. A minimum ratio of 10:1 should be maintained for the taper and plies are typically dropped off in pairs. Be wary of the effects ply drop offs can have on the surface contour of the part.
  • There should be an off-set distance between a ply drop off and a mating surface.
  • The structural thickness of the material should also be designed to withstand impact from maintenance, tool drop and handling accidents.
  • For carbon composites, if any other materials are to come into contact with the laminate, especially aluminum, a glass fibre ply in the contact are should be considered to prevent galvanic corrosion.
  • The final surface ply of a laminate should be oriented in a direction that is the least structurally critical. For woven fabric it is generally ±45°. If the last ply is a unidirectional tape, two plies should be used perpendicular to each other, usually +45° and -45°.
  • If a part is made from mainly unidirectional tape, it is recommended to apply a layer of carbon woven fabric or a thin glass fibre scrim ply to the surfaces. This is to prevent handling damage and machining damage such as splintering.
  • To reduce chances of matrix microcracking in unidirectional laminates, a few plies should be placed with the same orientation. For quarter inch laminates, four plies of 0.008 inch plies in the same direction should suffice.
  • If a load bearing part is in contact with a moving part, prevent abrasion by applying a wear resistant material.
  • Plies can be spliced in order to create a ply that is large enough for the layup. The two types of splices are butt joints and overlap joints. Plies with dissimilar orientations should not be spliced.

Next Steps[edit | edit source]

Continue the product development process with Material Selection and Shape Development.


Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles

References

  1. [Ref] Eckold, Geoff (1994). Design and Manufacture of Composite Structures. Woodhead Publishing. ISBN 9781845698560. Retrieved 25 May 2022.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  2. [Ref] Composite Materials Handbook 17 - Polymer Matrix Composites; Materials Usage, Design and Analysis. 3. SAE International on behalf of CMH-17, a division of Wichita State University. 2012. ISBN 978-1-68015-454-2.CS1 maint: date and year (link)



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.