The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Practice for Developing a Product - P111

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Practice - A6Integrated Product Development - A249Practice for Developing a Product - P111
 
Practice for Developing a Product
Practice document
Document Type Practice
Document Identifier 111
Tags
Objective functions
CostMaintain
RateMaintain
QualityMaintain
MSTE workflow Development
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

The figure below shows the breakdown of the product development process in terms of MSTEP. This process includes four main steps as listed below:

  1. Determine cost, rate, and functional requirements
  2. Define shape and material system
  3. Identify process steps, and finally
  4. Process step development


These four steps are highlighted in the pyramids in the figure below.

MSTE Figure with Pyramids for Design With Numbers Relating to Each Chapter

Scope[edit | edit source]

This page will guide the user through the development of a composite product using the MSTE methodology that the KPC is built upon. It will work in a loop with various iterations as each design choice will have an effect on each other to varying degrees.

1. Determine Cost, Rate and Functional Requirements[edit | edit source]

Establishing requirements for your part is the first step in any design process. This will be the foundation and framework for the entirety of the development process. It establishes the top of the MSTE pyramid, which we use to build the rest of the development process. Ensure you have a complete and accurate understanding of the cost, rate, and functional requirements your part must satisfy. Here are some examples:

  1. Cost limits
  2. Production volumes (total and rate)
  3. Geometry
  4. Surface finish
  5. Deflection limits
  6. Loads
  7. Service temperature
  8. Dimensional accuracy
  9. Weight limits


For a more complete list and how to consider the items see Establishing functional requirements.

2. Define Shape and Material System[edit | edit source]

Defining materials and shape with respect to the functional requirements establishes the second area of the MSTE pyramid. This section has split the material selection and shape selection into two areas, but it is important to keep in mind the interplay between material systems and shape as they can both influence each other. At this stage in the design process the user will be seeing the necessity for looping and re-iterating the design choices as they are affected further down the line. Looking further ahead, the selection of the processes to be used will have to ensure that the composite part is manufacturable, cost effective and scalable. Material selection for composites is inherently complicated due to the vast number of fibre types and fibre structures. The common fibre types: glass, aramid and carbon themselves have variations in properties and cost. Also, there is a wide selection of resin to choose from, which have variations in properties, both in performance and processing. How the resin and fibres interact is also an important aspect as the bonding interface between the two will determine how much of the stresses imposed on a part will be able to successfully transfer into and out of the fibers via the resin. For the section on selecting materials see Material Selection.


Simultaneously, the shape of the product must be considered, this entails both the geometry of the part as well as the internal structure of the product. The shape design will consider three main structure types: solid laminates, stiffened structures and sandwich structures. Based on the functional requirements identified in the previous step, an initial geometrical concept must be created. The choices here may also be influenced by pre-existing equipment that is available; however, it is important to consider the benefits that other manufacturing equipment could bring to the final part and fully examine the best geometrical concepts and material choices. Also consider DFMA (Design For Manufacturing and Assembly), eg. mounting points and or galvanic protection. For the section on shape design see Shape Development.

3. Identify Process Steps[edit | edit source]

Based on the material and shape selection from the previous step (possibly in conjunction with any pre-existing equipment available), select the type of processes, i.e. process steps, that will work with the given geometry and material system and in turn the relevant equipment and tooling & consumables. The process selection section will present various process workflows to choose from as well as a table for rapid evaluation and narrowing down of processes. The solutions presented can be modified to fit the user’s specific product and it is important to keep in mind that the process must not only consider the shape and material, but also the functional requirements laid out in the initial step. For the section on process step selection see Practice for Identifying Process Steps.

4. Process Step Development[edit | edit source]

Now that all the steps are defined it is time to develop the process steps and source all the tooling and equipment. See Practice for Developing a Process Step.



Explore this area further

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.