The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Composite Production Part Drawing - P169

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
 
Composite Production Part Drawing
Practice document
Document Type Practice
Document Identifier 169
Themes
Tags
Objective functions
CostMaintain
RateMaintain
QualityIncrease
MSTE workflow Development

Overview[edit | edit source]

Engineering drawings are required to communicate all the information necessary to manufacture a component or assembly. In the past, before 3D modelling software was commonplace, engineering drawings were the only form of communication for describing a part or assembly so that it could be manufactured as intended. Important information provided on drawings includes material type, dimensions, and tolerances. Today, CAD files are often used to support drawings and can reduce the need for rigorous dimensioning. However, engineering drawings are still typically used to convey all of the key information needed to manufacture a part.

Scope[edit | edit source]

The purpose of this document is to provide instruction on creating composite production part engineering drawings. This will include background information on the purpose and requirements of engineering drawings in general, with emphasis on the additional information that is required for composite parts.

Aspects of part drawing[edit | edit source]

Drawings for composite components are unique in that they are designed to achieve properties for a certain purpose, and the material is in essence designed and built specifically for that component. Therefore, lay-up schedule, ply orientation, identification of tool side, fibre content and other composite related information must also be included.

Dimensioning[edit | edit source]

Because composite components are fabricated using tools, major geometry is already captured by the tool itself and does not necessarily require rigorous dimensioning. Overall dimensions should still typically be included for reference purposes. However, important dimensions to capture, which may not be included in the CAD geometry are trim, holes, cut-outs, locations of inserts, tapping plates and other finishing details.

Layup Schedule[edit | edit source]

The layup schedule provides instruction on building the material that will make-up the composite part. The clearest way to communicate the layup schedule is in a table form that indicates at a minimum, ply number, material, and angle. When specifying ply orientation, a reference axis should be provided to indicate which direction has been assumed as 0 degrees on a particular layup/part. Additional information may include thickness, amount of resin required, and layup regions among other items. Information regarding tool side, manufacturing method, gel coat, etc. can be included in a separate note block or in the layup table as deemed appropriate.

Example of Layup Table/Schedule

Materials[edit | edit source]

If the composite component is designed with materials specific to a particular supplier, the product trade names should be used and the supplier identified in the notes. If cores, infusion media, or other intermediary materials are specified in the layup schedule, these should be included in either the table or notes as deemed appropriate. If generic materials are required, the fibre type should be defined as glass, carbon, or other, and fabric type and weight should be provided. Alternatively, if appropriate, minimum mechanical and/or thermal properties may be provided to guide material selection.

Manufacturing Method[edit | edit source]

Manufacturing method should be indicated on the drawing, with any additional information required to clarify or control the process. A particular manufacturing method may be interpreted or performed slightly differently from one fabricator to another. In many cases, this may not be critical, but for parts where a specific design requirement is highly process dependent, this must be noted. The drawing should control the manufacturing process where necessary, but allow freedom for the fabricator where feasible. For example, if a part must have a certain glass transition temperature, this is achieved with resin choice and cure cycle. In this case, a note could be included on the drawing prescribing a specific cure cycle or referencing another document that does so. Another option is to specify the required glass transition temperature, leaving the fabricator the freedom to achieve this as they see fit. Alternatively, the drawing may reference a process specification document that outlines the process requirements in detail. As another example, for a prepreg layup with many plies, intermediate consolidation at every X number of plies may be suggested to ensure desired thickness and fibre content is met.

Notes[edit | edit source]

Examples of critical pieces of information that should be provided in the notes block are provided below:

  • Tool side ply
  • Manufacturing method
  • Fibre content by weight or volume if it is critical to part performance
  • Brief description of materials to support information in layup table
  • Trim details/requirements
  • Joint/splicing/overlap details if critical
  • Alternative allowable materials if available
  • Reference to CAD geometry if applicable

An example note block is provided in the figure below.

Example of notes block

Example Drawing[edit | edit source]

Example of production part drawing

Conclusion and Further Information[edit | edit source]

This article has provided the basic guidelines for creating an engineering drawing for a composite part. It is intended to supplement references on engineering drawings in general. There are a number of references available that provide extensive detail and instruction regarding standard drawing practices, including dimensioning style, annotation style, and other information.



Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles



About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.