Maintaining equivalency during cure for different fibre architectures - P118
Maintaining equivalency during cure for different fibre architectures | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice document | |||||||
Document Type | Practice | ||||||
Document Identifier | 118 | ||||||
Themes | |||||||
Tags | |||||||
Objective functions |
| ||||||
MSTE workflow | Development | ||||||
Prerequisites |
Q: "I have used a given resin system to cure a wide variety of good quality parts but am looking at switching reinforcement styles (such as to a tightly woven reinforcement). How do I ensure that I can continue to make good quality parts with the same cure cycle?
A: To ensure that the same cure cycle will work for both reinforcement types, the two composites must be similar from a chemical, physical, and mechanical perspective. If the material properties of the reinforcement have changed significantly, then you can likely expect an altered response. This includes thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, density, volume, thickness, and the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). Moreover, if the change in reinforcement results in a change in fibre volume fraction or a change in the ply thickness, then you can again expect an altered response even with the same cure cycle. All else equal, a decrease in fibre volume fraction will result in a higher exotherm. If the fibre volume fraction is similar but the ply thickness is greater then the exotherm will again increase.
Regarding stress-induced defects, if the CTE of the new reinforcement has changed significantly this may result in part deformation upon demoulding. In such a case, the cure cycle or tooling may have to be altered to mitigate this problem.
These are just some of the considerations to weigh when changing the reinforcement.
Overview[edit | edit source]
Changing the fibre reinforcement alters the material properties of the composite. This is true at the ply level and the laminate level. Depending on how significant the change in reinforcement is, this could have minor or major ramifications on part quality. In order to ensure equivalent quality during cure, the chemical, physical, and mechanical response of the new composite (i.e. with the new reinforcement) must meet the same quality metrics as the old composite.
Thermal management considerations[edit | edit source]
From a thermal management perspective, this should be a minor change, but the following should be considered at a minimum:
- Is the fibre different? Changing from carbon fibre to glass fibre is a significant change, but even different grades of the same fibre type can lead to changes in specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermal diffusivity of the reinforcement form. This can affect the thermal response of the system.
- Is the fibre volume fraction (Vf) different? This can affect the composite properties, and again affect the thermal response of the system. To learn how to measure Vf, visit the following page: How to measure reinforcement content.
- Is the ply thickness different? If so, the total laminate thickness will change, and this can again affect the thermal response of the system.
To learn more about the former two points, visit the following page:
To learn more about how laminate thickness may affect the thermal response of the system, visit the following page:
Material deposition management considerations[edit | edit source]
Link to material deposition management
Content coming soon.
Flow and consolidation management considerations[edit | edit source]
Link to flow and consolidation management
Content coming soon.
Residual stress and dimensional control management considerations[edit | edit source]
Link to residual stress and dimensional control management
If the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the new reinforcement has changed significantly, then the residual stressed induced by the tool-part interaction will have also changed. This may act to increase or decrease the chance of part warpage upon demoulding depending on the disparity between the composite CTE and the tool CTE. A higher disparity will tend to increase CTE-induced deformation. Below is a table of common CTE values. Generally speaking, it is best to have tools with a low CTE for carbon fibre-epoxy composites.
Material | CTE (x10-6/°C) |
---|---|
Aluminum | 23 |
Steel | 11 |
Invar | 0.6 to 1.5 |
Epoxy | 45 to 62 |
Polyester | 60 to 200 |
Vinylester | 100 to 150 |
Carbon fibre (longitudinal) |
-0.2 to -0.5 |
Carbon fibre (transverse) | 10 to 15 |
E-glass fibre (longitudinal) | 5 |
E-glass fibre (transverse) | 5 |
Related pages
Page type | Links |
---|---|
Introduction to Composites Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Articles | |
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents | |
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Knowledge Articles | |
Systems Knowledge Method Documents | |
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples | |
Systems Catalogue Articles | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables | |
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment | |
Practice Documents | |
Case Studies | |
Perspectives Articles |
|
References
- ↑ [Ref] Daniel, Isaac M.; Ishai, Ori (2006). Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515097-1.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
- ↑ [Ref] MatWeb LLC. "MatWeb: Online Materials Information Resource". Retrieved 9 September 2020.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
About | Help |
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.