EnglishFrenchGermanJapanesePortugueseSpanish

The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Systems Knowledge - A4Materials deposition and consolidation management (MDCM) - A157

Material deposition management - A157

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Revision as of 04:34, 28 April 2021 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Pushed from CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 
Material deposition management
Systems knowledge article
MDM Icon-JJBnrDwmVS9r.svg
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 157
Themes
Tags
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

Material deposition management is concerned with knowing, understanding, and managing how the constituent materials of a composite part are placed onto the tooling, and onto each other. Completing the material deposition process steps and acheiving good quality outcomes in terms of fibre alignment (misorientation, wrinkling and waviness), voids and other factors are very important to the final quality of the part. These process steps can be extremely challenging and time consuming depending on the type of material deposition process steps carried out, the form of the material, and the curvature of the tooling. The combined effect of the material deposition process steps and the subsequent flow & consolidation and thermal transformation steps will determine local porosity, resin volume fraction leading to either resin rich or resin starved areas, and fiber misalignment.

Material deposition processes can be broadly separated into “infusion” processes where the fiber is positioned on the tool and then matrix is added, and “wet” or "prepreg" type processes where the fiber and matrix are combined before the mix is positioned on the tool.

A factory process flow. The process chosen should not be driven by historical process names often based on material depsoition process steps. Instead, it should be driven by the shape of the part and the material used for the part; these will define the equipment and tooling & consumables that are appropriate, thereby fully defining the MSTEP collection for each process step.

Additionally, by convention, the composites industry names and classifies manufacturing processes after one or more critical process steps in the manufacturing workflow (typically a material deposition step) or after the material form that is processed. Some examples of composites manufacturing processes historically named after material deposition process steps are:

  • Vacuum assisted resin infusion (VARI)/vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM)
  • Resin transfer moulding (RTM)
  • Spray-up
  • Filament winding
  • Tube rolling
  • Automated fibre placement (AFP)/automated tape laying (ATL)

While these are common and sometimes useful names for discussing these manufacturing processes with others, it is important to remember that it is actually the part and material that determine which process steps must be performed and which equipment/tooling can be used to perform them. The layout of these process steps are what define the manufacturing workflow rather than a pre-defined manufacturing process. Recognizing this important fact and using it to guide the development of a manufacturing process will ensure that the most appropriate material deposition steps are utilized.

The content related to materials deposition manangement in the Knowledge in Practice Centre is currently quite limited as we are in the early stages of content creation and have focused on the theme of thermal management. We will be working on material deposition management next, and encourage you to check back in the future for more content in this theme.

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles


About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.

To use this website, you must agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

By clicking "I Accept" below, you confirm that you have read, understood, and accepted our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.