EnglishFrenchGermanJapanesePortugueseSpanish

The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Systems Knowledge - A4System parameters - inputs and outcomes - A108

System parameters - inputs and outcomes - A108

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Revision as of 21:29, 14 October 2022 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Pushed from CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 
System parameters - inputs and outcomes
Systems knowledge article
ConvectionOvenSystemParameters-t2gmjZFp8AW2.svg
General system description breakdown
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 108
Themes
Tags
Prerequisites

Overview[edit | edit source]

In many applications, the outcomes of a given process are due to a number of interacting parameters. Considering the effect of all interacting parameters together is known as a systems level approach. Such an approach can be applied to composites manufacturing[1]. In composite manufacturing processes, the interacting parameters may be attributed to the part material (M), part shape (S), tooling and consumables (T), or the equipment (E). For example, during thermal transformation, the equipment supplies temperature, pressure, and vacuum, which interacts with the material and geometrical properties of the part and tooling to affect the part quality. This includes outcomes such as final degree of cure (DOC), porosity, wrinkling, warpage, spring-in, etc. In other words, part quality is influenced by the MSTE inputs for each process step. This is a useful distinction, as it allows engineers and practitioners to simulate and tailor the appropriate parameters to pass specifications and achieve acceptable part quality.

SystemParameters-inputs&outcomes-bN3ZGMcRmMxU.svg


Any parameter of a system can be constrained physically, by specifications, or by self-imposed desires of the manufacturer/designer[2]. An example of a physical constraint would be the maximum temperature an unloaded oven can reach. This is dictated by the physical design of the oven and cannot be changed. A specification, on the other hand, can be physically changed but is in place to meet regulations. For example, a company in the supply chain for a large OEM may have process specifications imposed on them by the OEM. An example may include the cure window that the material must adhere to. Finally, a designer or manufacturer may impose their own constraints on their manufacturing processes in order to achieve their cost, rate, and quality metrics.

To understand how system parameters come together to influence the system response in a general sense refer to system interactions. For a detailed description of thermal management related system effects refer to the following pages:


Material parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to material page in Systems Catalogue

Material parameters include the material properties, material formulation (eg. dry fabric, prepreg, resin etc.), and the associated specifications for the material. The specifications define the processing requirements specific to the material system. The Manufacturer Recommended Cure Cycle (MRCC) for a given resin system is an example. The material parameters along with the shape parameters define the outcome sensitivity for the system. That is, how the part responds to the imposed boundary conditions.

Shape parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to shape page in Systems Catalogue

The shape parameters include the physical description of the part. That is, its internal and external geometry. Each of these parameters will influence the way the part behaves during processing and must be considered. For example, a thick part will take much longer to reach a uniform internal temperature as compared with a thin part. Additionally, local shape changes may influence both mechanical and thermal properties of the part.

Tooling and consumable parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to tooling and consumables page in Systems Catalogue

Combined with the equipment parameters, the tooling parameters form the boundary conditions for the part. Tooling material and thickness are important parameters as these will influence the mechanical and thermal properties of the tool, which will in turn affect outcomes such as part temperature and residual stress induced by tool-part interaction. Material properties and thickness are also of importance for the consumables in a vacuum bag setup, as they too will influence heat transfer across the bagside of the part.

Equipment parameters[edit | edit source]

Link to equipment page in Systems Catalogue

right
Equipment applies energy (eg. heat) to the tool/part assembly in order to affect it in some way.

The equipment parameters define the environment in which the tooling, part, and/or raw materials sit. Common equipment parameters that can be controlled are temperature, pressure, and vacuum. In a convective heating system, airflow is another important parameter as it will greatly influence the heat transfer coefficient. However, airflow is difficult to control unless specifically designed for.

Outcomes[edit | edit source]

Outcomes are the parameters of a system that are tracked and evaluated in order to provide metrics for acceptance. The part thermal history is a common outcome. If the intended thermal history of the part falls within the required bounds, then the outcome is deemed acceptable. If all outcomes are deemed acceptable, then part quality is achieved. If an outcome is unacceptable then the part has not achieved the intended quality and troubleshooting must take place. Ensuring that the part achieves its thermal management outcomes is highly important, as not meeting the requirements could cause defects in the final part, which may not appear until the later in the factory workflow or even once the part is in service. For example, thermal outcomes such as part temperature may have a direct or indirect effect on later processing themes, such as residual stress and dimensional control.

Many outcomes may be challenging or detrimental to measure directly. Because of this, proxy outcomes are often used. Degree of cure (DOC) is an example. While the DOC of the part is of significant concern for thermal transformation, it is difficult to measure directly without advanced or destructive measurement techniques. Therefore, part temperature during cure is typically used a proxy.

Related pages

Page type Links
Introduction to Composites Articles
Foundational Knowledge Articles
Foundational Knowledge Method Documents
Foundational Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Knowledge Articles
Systems Knowledge Method Documents
Systems Knowledge Worked Examples
Systems Catalogue Articles
Systems Catalogue Objects – Material
Systems Catalogue Objects – Shape
Systems Catalogue Objects – Tooling and consumables
Systems Catalogue Objects – Equipment
Practice Documents
Case Studies
Perspectives Articles

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 [Ref] Fabris, Janna Noemi (2018). A Framework for Formalizing Science Based Composites Manufacturing Practice (Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. doi:10.14288/1.0372787.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  2. [Ref] Ashby, M.F. (2011). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-25539-5. ISBN 9781856176637.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)


About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.

To use this website, you must agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

By clicking "I Accept" below, you confirm that you have read, understood, and accepted our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.