The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Reference - Liquid flow in molds with prelocated fiber mats

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Type Journal
Title Liquid flow in molds with prelocated fiber mats
Abstract The mechanism associated with mold filling in the manufacture of structural RIM (SRIM) and resin transfer molding (RTM) composites is studied by means of flow visualization and pressure drop measurements. To facilitate this study, an acrylic mold with a variable cavity was constructed and the flow patterns of nonreactive fluid flowing through various layers, types, and combinations of preplaced glass fiber reinforcement mats were photographed for both evacuated and nonevacuated molds. The pressure drops in the flow through a single type of reinforcement (e.g., a continuous strand random fiber mat) and also a combination of reinforcement types (e.g., a stitched bidirectional mat in combination with a random fiber mat) were recorded at various flow rates to simulate high-speed feeding processes (e.g., SRIM) and low-speed feeding processes (e.g., RTM). By changing the amount of reinforcement placed into the mold, the permeabilities of the different types and combinations of glass fiber mats were obtained as a function of porosity. It is shown that partially evacuating the mold cavity decreases the size of bubbles or voids in the liquid, but ultimately increases the maximum pressure during filling. The results also show that glass fiber mats exhibit anisotropic permeabilities with the thickness permeability, Kz, being extremely important and often the determining factor in the pressure generated in the mold during filling.
Authors
  • Molnar, J. A.
  • Trevino, L.
  • Lee, L. J.
Date 1989-12
Issue 6
Pages 414-423
Journal Polymer Composites
Volume 10
Websites
DOI 10.1002/pc.750100605
ISSN 0272-8397
Cite
To cite this Reference:
  1. Edit any page with the VisualEditor.
  2. Position the cursor where the citation is needed.
  3. On the VE toolbar, click "Insert", then "Template".
  4. In the dialog form field, enter "Ref".
  5. Click "Add template".
  6. In the "Reference Page name" field, enter "5b1c9ee9-2115-3b63-92cf-b6f05a1b8dba".
  7. (optional) Add a page number or range by clicking "Add more information".
  8. Click "Insert".
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.