Template:Cite patent
40px | This template is used on approximately 3,800 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.
Transclusion count updated automatically (see documentation). |
This template identifies a patent or patent application and links to the patents entry in the espacenet database, and also provides some additional information about the cited patent. Suggested uses are within a pair of <ref></ref> tags or as part of a (patent) bibliography at the end of the article. This template should not be used in the body of an article; for more details, see the External Links guideline.
General patent template for citing patents or patent applications from any country is drawn from the espacenet database. This database is more useful than the USPTO database since it highlights related patents/applications in other countries as well as providing current status information and offers a multi-language interface (English/French/German).
Usage
Copy the text below into an article to reference a patent
{{cite patent | country = | number = | status = | title = | pubdate = | gdate = | fdate = | pridate = | inventor = | invent1 = | invent2 = | assign1 = | assign2 = | class = | url = }} |
|
Vertical list | Prerequisites | Brief instructions / notes |
---|---|---|
{{cite patent | country = | number = | status = | title = | pubdate = | gdate = | fdate = | pridate = | inventor = | invent1 = | invent2 = | assign1 = | assign2 = | class = | url = }} |
REQUIRED if "status=application" unless "status=application" |
two letter country code patent or patent application publication number application/patent title publication date (YYYY-MM-DD) granted date (YYYY-MM-DD) filing date (YYYY-MM-DD) (earliest) priority date (YYYY-MM-DD) list of inventors (free format) first inventor name ( second inventor name first assignee name second assignee name ECLA classification explicit URL (if not present on espacenet) |
- If a field name is listed in the Prerequisites column, it is a prerequisite for the field to the left.
Parameters
The fields should be filled in with the following information
{{cite patent | country = <!-- two letter country code --> | number = <!-- patent or patent application publication number --> | status = <!-- application/patent --> | title = <!-- title --> | pubdate = <!-- YYYY-MM-DD --> | gdate = <!-- YYYY-MM-DD --> | fdate = <!-- YYYY-MM-DD --> | pridate = <!-- YYYY-MM-DD --> | inventor = <!-- list of inventors (free format) --> | invent1 = <!-- first inventor name --> | invent2 = <!-- second inventor name --> | assign1 = <!-- first assignee name --> | assign2 = <!-- second assignee name --> | class = <!-- ECLA classification --> | url = <!-- Explicit URL --> }}
Explanation of fields:
- The country must be the two letter country code, e.g. "US" or "WO" (for international patent applications) See here for the full list of country codes.
- Do not put commas in patent number
- Applications must be identified by publication number
- Add " | title = title " to display the title. Required
- Add " | status = application " if the citation is a pending application. Preferably include " | status = patent " if a granted patent.
- Add " | assign1 = assignee " to display the assignee. Increase the numeral for subsequent assignees. Template currently handles two assignees.
- Add " | inventor = inventor list to provide the inventor names. Displayed by the template but not used to generate COinS meta data. If
|inventor=
is present but blank, no inventor names will be displayed, even if|invent1=
contains a name. - Add " | invent1 = inventor last name, inventor first name " to provide the inventor name. Displayed by the template and also used to generate COinS meta data. Increase the numeral for subsequent inventors. Template currently handles four inventors.
- Add " | pubdate = YYYY-MM-DD " to provide the publication date of an application. This is only displayed if "status=application" is included. For granted patents, use gdate. Required if "status=application".
- Add " | gdate = YYYY-MM-DD " to provide the date of grant of a patent. Is displayed unless "status=application" is included. Preferentially include "status=patent" to confirm that the patent is granted, but this is not required. Required unless "status=application".
- Add " | pridate = YYYY-MM-DD " to provide the (earliest) priority date. Not displayed, but could be useful to include for future reference. Including multiple priorities unnecessarily complicated.
- Add " | fdate = YYYY-MM-DD " to provide the filing date. Not displayed, but used to generate COinS meta data and may prove useful in future.
- Add " |class=ECLA classification " to provide the ECLA classification. Not displayed, but could be useful to include for future reference. Might be possible to automatically link to the relevant classification in future, but URLs are complex.
- Add " |url=url " to provide an explicit URL to the patent information. This is only necessary for patents that aren't present on espacenet.com; typically very old patents.
Details
The "country" parameter must be a two letter country code without periods (e.g. US or EP, not U.S., USA, or E.P.)
The number parameter must be the patent number or patent application publication number without any intervening commas or other punctuation (e.g. 2135432, not 2,135,432; likewise, 2005108455, not 2005/108455). You may need to experiment with the precise form for published US patent applications or PCT applications, which are slightly unusual. Help for getting the correct number format can be found here.
Add "|status=application" (without quotes) if you are citing a patent application rather than a patent. Patent applications must be referred to by publication number, not application number.
One (or both) of the publication date or the grant date must be included, as must the title.
Examples
To cite WIPO (aka PCT) patent application WO 2005/083605 A1, use:
{{cite patent | country = WO | number = 2005083605 | status = application | title = Insurance fee calculation device, insurance fee calculation program, insurance fee calculation method, and insurance fee calculation system | pubdate = 2005-09-09 | fdate = 2005-02-24 | pridate = 2004-02-26 | invent1 = Kozakai Toshihiko | assign1 = Aioi Insurance Co Ltd }}
Results in: WO application 2005083605, Kozakai Toshihiko, "Insurance fee calculation device, insurance fee calculation program, insurance fee calculation method, and insurance fee calculation system", published 2005-09-09, assigned to Aioi Insurance Co Ltd
To cite US patent 7,143,445, use:
{{cite patent |country=US |number=7143445 |status=patent}}
Results in: US patent 7143445
To cite US patent 7,143,445, published 2006-11-28, use:
{{cite patent |country=US |number=7143445 |gdate=2006-11-28}}
Results in: US 7143445, issued 2006-11-28
To cite US patent application 2006265789 use:
{{cite patent |country=US |number=2006265789 |status=application}}
Results in: US application 2006265789
To cite European patent application 1727416, use:
{{cite patent |country=EP |number=1727416 |status=application}}
Results in: EP application 1727416
COinS
This template produces COinS metadata; see COinS in Wikipedia for background information.
TemplateData
TemplateData for Cite patent
General patent template for citing patents or patent applications from any country is drawn from the espacenet database.
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Country code | country country-code country | two letter country code (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2); the top 10 countries by patent application in 2011 were - JP=Japan, CN=China, US=United States, KR=South Korea, DE=Germany, FR=France, GB=United Kingdom, CH=Switzerland, NL=Netherlands, RU=Russia
| String | suggested |
Publication number | number publication-number patent-number | patent or patent application publication number ... do not include commas (e.g. 1,700,545 should be 1700545) | Line | suggested |
Title | title | patent title | String | required |
Status | status description status | application or patent - If pending, use application. If granted, use patent
| Line | suggested |
Date of publication | pubdate publication-date | the publication date of an application, required if status/description=application; use format YYYY-MM-DD
| Line | suggested |
Filing date | fdate | the filing date; this is not displayed, but is used to generate COinS meta data and may have future utility. Use YYYY-MM-DD
| Date | optional |
Priority date | pridate | the (earliest) priority date; this is not displayed, but could be useful to include for future reference. Including multiple priorities is unnecessarily complicated. Use YYYY-MM-DD
| Unknown | optional |
Date of issue | gdate issue-date | the date of grant (issuance) of a patent; required if status/description _is not_ "application"
| Unknown | suggested |
Inventor 1 - surname | invent1 inventor-surname inventor1-surname inventor-last inventor1-last inventor invent-1 invent1 | surname - 1st inventor
| Line | suggested |
Inventor 2 - surname | invent2 inventor2-surname inventor2-last inventor2 invent2 | surname - 2nd inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 3 - surname | invent3 inventor3-surname inventor3-last inventor3 invent3 | surname - 3rd inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 4 - surname | invent4 inventor4-surname inventor4-last inventor4 invent4 | surname - 4th inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 1 - given name | inventor1-first inventor-given inventor1-given inventor-first | given name - 1st inventor | Line | suggested |
Inventor 2 - given name | inventor2-first inventor2-given | given name - 2nd inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 3 - given name | inventor3-first inventor3-given | given name - 3rd inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 4 - given name | inventor4-first inventor4-given | given name - 4th inventor | Line | optional |
Inventor 1 - Wikipedia article | inventorlink inventorlink1 | Wikilink biographical article name, no square brackets | Page | optional |
Inventor 2 - Wikipedia article | inventorlink2 | add biographical article name, no square brackets | Page | optional |
Inventor 3 - Wikipedia article | inventorlink3 | add biographical article name, no square brackets | Page | optional |
Inventor 4 - Wikipedia article | inventorlink4 | add biographical article name, no square brackets | Page | optional |
Assignee - first | assign1 | first assignee's name | Line | optional |
Assignee - second | assign2 | second assignee's name | Line | optional |
URL | url | Explicit URL to patent information
| URL | optional |
See also
- {{Citation}}
- {{EPO Register}}, to include a link to the European Patent Register entry of a European patent or patent application
- {{Patent}}, a generic template for general use referring to world's patent offices
- {{US patent}}, to include a link to a US patent
- {{US patent application}}, to cite a US patent application as a reference in "references" section
- {{US patent reference}}, to cite a US patent as a reference in "references" section
- {{USPTO Application}}
- {{USPTO Patent}}
The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Cite patent/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |
Welcome
Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:
Understanding Composites Processing
The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:
- The factory
- Factory cells and/or the factory layout
- Process steps (embodied in the factory process flow) consisting of:
The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.
Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process
Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:
Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.
Workflows
The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:
- Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
- Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
- Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.