The CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre is in the early stages of content creation and currently focuses on the theme of thermal management.
We appreciate any feedback or content suggestions/requests using the links below

Content requests General feedback Feedback on this page

Pressure sensors - A222

From CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre
Pressure sensors
Document Type Article
Document Identifier 222
Relevant Class

Equipment

Tags
Factory Cells
Prerequisites

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Pressure sensors are widely used in composites manufacturing processes to monitor and control pressure conditions which are critical to part quality and structural performance. Pressure affects resin flow, consolidation, void formation, heat transfer coefficients and curing behaviour. Accurately measuring pressure during production runs can be beneficial in ensuring consistency in part quality and also provide essential data for process optimization and control.

This page provides an overview of pressure sensors commonly used in composite manufacturing and testing applications. It highlights the types of sensors, typical uses, advantages and limitations, and key considerations for their effective use.

Scope[edit | edit source]

This page focuses on the use of pressure sensors in manufacturing processes such as vacuum bagging, resin infusion, resin transfer moulding (RTM), autoclave curing, and mechanical testing of composites. Basic sensor principles, selection factors, and practical application notes are provided.

Significance[edit | edit source]

The mechanical performance and quality of composite materials are significantly affected by the pressure conditions during processing. In manufacturing, accurate control and monitoring of pressure are critical for ensuring proper resin flow, fibre consolidation, and void reduction. Pressure sensors are commonly used to verify integrity of vacuum bags during materials deposition steps as well as to record real-time data in processes such as resin infusion, and autoclave curing. In mechanical testing equipment, pressure sensors are used to measure the applied load by converting mechanical force to electrical signals. Hence, reliable pressure sensors are critical for quality assurance and certification of composite manufacturing processes.

Prerequisites[edit | edit source]

Recommended documents to review before, or in parallel with this document:

Overview[edit | edit source]

Pressure sensors are devices that detect the force exerted by a fluid (liquid or gas) or surface contact and convert it into an electrical signal, typically through resistive, capacitive, piezoelectric, or optical mechanisms. In manufacturing, pressure sensors can be integrated into autoclaves, vacuum bags, resin infusion systems, and automated fibre placement (AFP) heads, where they monitor compaction forces at the roller-substrate interface. In mechanical testing systems, they help quantify applied loads for testing of composite parts. A range of sensor types are available, each suited to specific environments, pressure ranges, and dynamic response requirements.

Types of pressure sensors[edit | edit source]

Flexible Film Pressure Sensors[edit | edit source]

These sensors measure pressure through resistive or capacitive changes across a flexible surface, typically used to map compaction pressure in AFP. However, the applicability of these sensors are limited by low pressure range and long-term drift.

Load Cells[edit | edit source]

Using strain gauges to measure deformation under load, load cells are commonly applied in mechanical testing setups such as compression tests. These sensors however cannot capture spatial pressure distribution.

Piezoelectric Sensors[edit | edit source]

Piezoelectric materials generate electric charge when stressed, which can be calibrated to measure the applied pressure making these sensors ideal for capturing fast dynamic events like impact testing. However, the biggest disadvanage of piezoelectric sensors is their inability to measure static pressure.

Pressure Transducers[edit | edit source]

These sensors convert fluid or gas pressure into electrical signals via strain gauge or capacitive elements, widely used in autoclaves or RTM setups. Depending on the material, pressure transducers might require signal conditioning and protection from harsh environments.

Capacitive Pressure Sensors[edit | edit source]

Capacitive pressure sensors operate by detecting changes in capacitance due to diaphragm deflection. These are particularly useful in low-pressure environments like vacuum leak monitoring, but are prone to electromagnetic interference and drift.

Optical Fibre Pressure Sensors[edit | edit source]

Fiber Bragg grating based fibre optic sensors can be used to detect pressure-induced strain via wavelength shifts in the grating. Due to the small diameter of the optical glass fibre, they are well suited for embedded or high-temperature cure environments. A large number of sensors can be multiplexed on a single fibre. The sensors themselves are inexpensive, however require expensive optical interrogation systems to implement.

MEMS-based Pressure Sensors[edit | edit source]

MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) sensors work by detecting the mechanical deformation of a micromachined silicon diaphragm under applied pressure. Tese sensors can be used for compact sensing in moulds or tooling, but are limited in durability under extreme conditions.


Comparison of Different Pressure Sensors[edit | edit source]

The table below summarizes the typical applications, advantages, disadvantages, and cost ranges for commonly used pressure sensors in composites manufacturing and testing.

Sensor Type Typical Application Advantages Disadvantages Typical Cost (CAD)
Flexible Film
  • Monitoring compaction pressure in AFP and ATL
  • Pressure distribution in vacuum bagging
  • Conformable to complex surfaces
  • Enables spatial pressure mapping
  • Thin and lightweight
  • Limited pressure range
  • Signal drift over time
  • Sensitive to handling and calibration
~$300–$1,500
Load Cell
  • Force measurement during mechanical testing (e.g., CAI)
  • Press consolidation monitoring
  • High accuracy and repeatability
  • Wide force range
  • Robust industrial designs available
  • No spatial resolution
  • Requires mechanical integration
  • Bulky in some configurations
~$250–$2,000
Piezoelectric
  • Impact testing
  • High-speed dynamic pressure measurement
  • Real-time process event detection
  • Excellent for dynamic and transient loads
  • High-frequency response
  • Compact form factor
  • Not suitable for static measurements
  • Requires charge amplifiers
  • Fragile sensing elements
~$800–$3,000
Pressure Transducer
  • Monitoring pressure in autoclaves, RTM, and vacuum bags
  • Process control feedback
  • Suitable for liquids and gases
  • Wide operating pressure range
  • Good accuracy and durability
  • Requires electrical signal conditioning
  • Can degrade with heat or chemical exposure
  • Installation-dependent accuracy
~$200–$2,500
Capacitive
  • Leak detection in vacuum bagging
  • Low-pressure resin front tracking
  • High sensitivity at low pressures
  • Compact and low power
  • Suitable for static measurements
  • Prone to electromagnetic interference
  • Thermal drift without compensation
  • Limited dynamic range
~$300–$1,200
Optical Fibre (FBG)
  • Embedded pressure monitoring during curing
  • Structural health monitoring (SHM)
  • Immune to EMI and high temperatures
  • Suitable for harsh or embedded environments
  • Multiplexing capability along a single fibre
  • High system cost
  • Requires optical interrogation units
  • Complex integration
~$2,000–$10,000+
MEMS
  • Localized sensing in tools or mould cavities
  • Compact process monitoring applications
  • Miniaturized and low power
  • Integrates easily into electronics
  • Suitable for mass production
  • Lower durability in harsh conditions
  • May have limited range or resolution
  • Requires protection from contamination
~$50–$500






About-hpWrZW97CxCB.svg
Help-hlkrZW15CxCB.svg
About Help
CKN KPC logo

Welcome

Welcome to the CKN Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC). The KPC is a resource for learning and applying scientific knowledge to the practice of composites manufacturing. As you navigate around the KPC, refer back to the information on this right-hand pane as a resource for understanding the intricacies of composites processing and why the KPC is laid out in the way that it is. The following video explains the KPC approach:

Understanding Composites Processing

The Knowledge in Practice Centre (KPC) is centered around a structured method of thinking about composite material manufacturing. From the top down, the heirarchy consists of:

The way that the material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment (abbreviated as MSTE) interact with each other during a process step is critical to the outcome of the manufacturing step, and ultimately critical to the quality of the finished part. The interactions between MSTE during a process step can be numerous and complex, but the Knowledge in Practice Centre aims to make you aware of these interactions, understand how one parameter affects another, and understand how to analyze the problem using a systems based approach. Using this approach, the factory can then be developed with a complete understanding and control of all interactions.

The relationship between material, shape, tooling & consumables and equipment during a process step


Interrelationship of Function, Shape, Material & Process

Design for manufacturing is critical to ensuring the producibility of a part. Trouble arises when it is considered too late or not at all in the design process. Conversely, process design (controlling the interactions between shape, material, tooling & consumables and equipment to achieve a desired outcome) must always consider the shape and material of the part. Ashby has developed and popularized the approach linking design (function) to the choice of material and shape, which influence the process selected and vice versa, as shown below:

The relationship between function, material, shape and process


Within the Knowledge in Practice Centre the same methodology is applied but the process is more fully defined by also explicitly calling out the equipment and tooling & consumables. Note that in common usage, a process which consists of many steps can be arbitrarily defined by just one step, e.g. "spray-up". Though convenient, this can be misleading.

The relationship between function, material, shape and process consisting of Equipment and Tooling and consumables


Workflows

The KPC's Practice and Case Study volumes consist of three types of workflows:

  • Development - Analyzing the interactions between MSTE in the process steps to make decisions on processing parameters and understanding how the process steps and factory cells fit within the factory.
  • Troubleshooting - Guiding you to possible causes of processing issues affecting either cost, rate or quality and directing you to the most appropriate development workflow to improve the process
  • Optimization - An expansion on the development workflows where a larger number of options are considered to achieve the best mixture of cost, rate & quality for your application.

To use this website, you must agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

By clicking "I Accept" below, you confirm that you have read, understood, and accepted our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.